05.04.2013 Views

The Nimrod Review - Official Documents

The Nimrod Review - Official Documents

The Nimrod Review - Official Documents

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>The</strong> <strong>Nimrod</strong> <strong>Review</strong><br />

12.9<br />

IPTs<br />

346<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<strong>The</strong> creation of Integrated Project Teams (IPTs).<br />

<strong>The</strong> formation of the Defence Procurement Agency (DPA).<br />

<strong>The</strong> formation of the Defence Logistics Organisation (DLO).<br />

<strong>The</strong> formation of the Defence Aviation Repair Agency (DARA).<br />

(see Figure 12.4 below).<br />

<strong>The</strong> 1998 SDR changes were motivated by a belief in the increased efficiencies and savings that would come from:<br />

(i) greater ‘project-orientated’ organisations, i.e. as opposed to ‘functionally-oriented’ organisations; (ii) greater<br />

‘purple’, i.e. a move from single-service to tri-service organisations; and (iii) greater ‘through-life’ management<br />

of platforms, i.e. throughout the whole CAMDID cycle. <strong>The</strong>se organisational changes are discussed in more<br />

detail in Chapter 13, but are briefly summarised below.<br />

12.10 McKinsey recommended a transition “from a functional to a project-based organisation based on Integrated<br />

Project Teams (IPTs)”. Although this process had started with MDGs, the move towards IPTs represented a<br />

major sea-change for three reasons. First, because IPTs were to have far wider responsibilities than MDGs,<br />

encompassing complete management of the platform throughout the CADMID cycle. Second, IPTs were to<br />

contain under one roof all of the staffs necessary for individual projects and platforms for all four functions,<br />

i.e. Engineering, Logistics, Finance and Commercial. Third, IPT Leaders (IPTL) were to have delegated to them<br />

far greater levels of power and responsibility than had previously been delegated to the ‘project’ level. <strong>The</strong> IPT<br />

model was adopted by both the DPA for procurement (see below) and the DLO for in-service support.<br />

DPA<br />

12.11<br />

DLO<br />

12.12<br />

DARA<br />

12.13<br />

<strong>The</strong> Procurement Executive (PE) was re-modelled to form the Defence Procurement Executive (DPE) as an<br />

Executive Agency of the MOD.<br />

<strong>The</strong> three single-Service in-service support organisations (RAF Logistics Command, Naval Support Command<br />

and Quartermaster General) were merged into a tri-Service (i.e. purple) organisation called Defence Logistics<br />

Organisation (DLO) to achieve greater efficiencies by converging similar logistics processes, eliminating duplication<br />

and overlap, and increasing the MOD’s ability to exert leverage on its suppliers. <strong>The</strong> DLO was formed in April<br />

2000 and a new 4-star post, Chief of Defence Logistics (CDL), created to head the DLO. <strong>The</strong> IPT model was<br />

adopted in full by the DLO. Upon the disbanding of RAF Logistics Command, the equipment support IPTs were<br />

‘brigaded’ into three groups broadly along environmental lines within the DLO (Sea, Land and Air) each headed<br />

by a 2-star military officer or Civil Service equivalent. For RAF aircraft, the 2-star was Director General Equipment<br />

Support (Air) (DG ES(Air)). Each service Board retained a 2-star officer from the DLO as a permanent member. In<br />

the case of the Air Force Board, this was DG ES(Air).<br />

<strong>The</strong> three single-Service aircraft deep maintenance and repair organisations merged into the tri-Service Defence<br />

Aviation Repair Agency (DARA).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!