05.04.2013 Views

The Nimrod Review - Official Documents

The Nimrod Review - Official Documents

The Nimrod Review - Official Documents

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>The</strong> <strong>Nimrod</strong> <strong>Review</strong><br />

20<br />

<strong>Nimrod</strong> Technical Developments<br />

2.30<br />

2.31<br />

<strong>The</strong> modification of the design of the Comet to allow the birth of the <strong>Nimrod</strong> involved a significant redesign<br />

and the addition of new fuselage elements as mentioned above. <strong>The</strong> conversion of the <strong>Nimrod</strong> MR1 to the MR2<br />

was driven principally by a need to upgrade the aircraft’s sensor systems. However, as a result of the additional<br />

electronics of the MR2, the aircraft’s air conditioning system had to be supplemented to ensure additional<br />

cooling. AAR was introduced to the <strong>Nimrod</strong> as part of the urgent response to the Falklands crisis as noted<br />

above.<br />

<strong>The</strong> following paragraphs set out the timeline of those changes in design which are relevant to the loss of<br />

XV230 many years later.<br />

Conversion from Comet to <strong>Nimrod</strong> MR1<br />

2.32<br />

2.33<br />

<strong>The</strong> replacement of the Comet’s Avon powerplants with the Spey 250 engine necessitated the introduction of<br />

an air starter system. To provide this, APU was installed in the tail area and a duct used to take hot air from the<br />

APU to the engine starter turbine. <strong>The</strong> endurance of the <strong>Nimrod</strong> could be increased by shutting down up to<br />

two engines. As and when it was necessary to re-start engines during flight, hot, pressurised air could be routed<br />

through the Cross-Feed duct from engines on one side of the aircraft to re-start the engines on the other side.<br />

<strong>The</strong>refore, there were occasions, both on the ground and airborne, when the Cross-Feed duct would contain<br />

very hot air and consequently it was insulated with a fibreglass covering contained within a stainless steel outer<br />

layer. This insulation was primarily designed to prevent heat damage to the surrounding structure.<br />

In order to further extend the endurance of the MR1, additional fuel tanks, No. 5 and No. 6, were added below<br />

the fuselage cabin floor, in what were previously baggage compartments, and two further tanks, No. 7 tank<br />

port and starboard, were attached on either side of the fuselage within the wing root area. <strong>The</strong> Cross-Feed duct<br />

passed in front of the new No. 7 tank, running through an area known as the No. 7 Tank Dry Bay on the port<br />

and starboard side.<br />

Conversion from MR1 to MR2<br />

2.34<br />

<strong>The</strong> principal reason for the conversion of the <strong>Nimrod</strong> from MR1 to MR2 was to upgrade the aircraft’s sensor<br />

systems. <strong>The</strong> heat generated by the new electronic equipment on board required additional air supplies for<br />

cooling. For this purpose, a Supplementary Conditioning Pack (SCP) was fitted to the <strong>Nimrod</strong> MR2 in the rear<br />

of the aircraft. <strong>The</strong> SCP was supplied with engine bleed-air from a branch taken off from the Cross-Feed duct.<br />

This air was ducted through a pressure regulating valve in the bomb bay and then ducted rearwards outside the<br />

bomb bay. At the point where the SCP leaves the bomb bay, it is routed through the lower part of the starboard<br />

No. 7 Tank Dry Bay. With engines at high power at low altitude, the temperature of the air in the SCP duct<br />

could be in the region of 470ºC. Thus, this addition to the already existing Cross-Feed duct placed a potential<br />

source of ignition in the aircraft, the significance of which was not recognised until over 25 years later, with the<br />

investigation into the loss of XV230; this is discussed in more detail in Chapter 4.<br />

Development of the AEW Mk3 and AAR Capability<br />

2.35<br />

2.36<br />

As explained above, the original <strong>Nimrod</strong> AAR installation was fitted during the Falklands conflict in 1982.<br />

Subsequently, the MOD decided to upgrade the AAR system and move the refuelling pipes, for the most part,<br />

out of the cabin and into the bomb bay. In 1985, in the course of the AEW3 programme, which was also<br />

required to have an AAR capability, the AAR system design was refined, to enable its incorporation as a formal<br />

modification to the aircraft design.<br />

During the initial incorporation of AAR into the AEW3, one of the fuel system design features which was<br />

considered by British Aerospace was the effect of the fuel tank blow-off valves. <strong>The</strong>se valves are fitted to all, bar<br />

two, 23 of the aircraft’s fuel tanks and operate as pressure relief valves: should the pressure in a fuel tank exceed<br />

23 <strong>The</strong> No. 4A tanks.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!