05.04.2013 Views

The Nimrod Review - Official Documents

The Nimrod Review - Official Documents

The Nimrod Review - Official Documents

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>The</strong> <strong>Nimrod</strong> <strong>Review</strong><br />

11.166 <strong>The</strong>re is little doubt that Chris Lowe was the dominant figure in the BAE Systems NSC management team. He<br />

bears the heaviest responsibility for the poor planning, poor management and poor execution of the NSC. He<br />

attempted in interview to distance himself from the project, suggesting that he was only keeping a ‘top level’<br />

eye on what was going on, and Witness C [BAE Systems] was responsible for the day-to-day running of the<br />

hazard assessment programme. But, in my judgment, he was clearly very much hands-on during both Phase 1<br />

and Phase 2 of the NSC and aware of what was going on. He clearly considered himself as more knowledgeable<br />

about Safety Cases than those around him. Most deferred to him. He was ambitious, both for himself and<br />

for the company. He believed this to be an opportunity to demonstrate that his department was involved in<br />

prestigious, cutting-edge work. He saw the NSC as a ‘showcase’ project which would enhance his standing<br />

and open up new commercial possibilities for BAE Systems. His department was nominated for the Chairman’s<br />

Bronze Award for innovation. On the back of the apparent success of the NSC, in December 2004, he made a<br />

sales pitch to the <strong>Nimrod</strong> IPT to do ‘Operational’ Safety Cases.<br />

11.167 Unfortunately, he underestimated the nature of the task and overestimated his own abilities. He did not take<br />

kindly to suggestions from those who, on occasion, thought they knew better (like Witness K [BAE Systems]).<br />

He was, at all material times, fully aware of the time problems that the project was running into. He turned a<br />

blind eye to the use of MRA4 generic data. He insisted on a ‘final push’ to get completion. What really mattered<br />

was producing an impressive-looking set of reports on time which could be trumpeted by his department as a<br />

success. He was ultimately prepared to draw a veil over the incomplete nature of the work. <strong>The</strong> actual content,<br />

quality and completeness of the work was not paramount important because he, like most others, assumed the<br />

<strong>Nimrod</strong> to be ‘safe anyway’ because of its service history.<br />

Richard Oldfield – NSC Project Leader<br />

11.168 Richard Oldfield played a key role in the NSC between 2001 and 2005. He was appointed in 2001 as Task Leader<br />

on the NSC. He played an important part in compiling the proposals for Phase 1 and 2 and acted as Project<br />

Manager within TTRO Engineering. He was in charge of the zonal hazard assessments carried out on both<br />

the MR2 and RMk1. He played a leading role at the Acceptance Conference on 31 August/1 September 2004<br />

and the Sixth PSWG. He too (deliberately) did not come clean about the figures for “Open” and “Unclassified”<br />

hazards and the large gap left in their analysis. It was his responsibility to monitor and manage the progress<br />

of the NSC project. He failed to manage the project properly. He bears a significant responsibility for the poor<br />

planning, poor management and poor execution of the NSC.<br />

Eric Prince – Flight Systems and Avionics Manager<br />

11.169 Eric Prince was the Flight Systems and Avionics Manager at the time, responsible (a) for Technical governance<br />

for Avionics, Mechanical Systems and Electrical Systems design and development on <strong>Nimrod</strong> MR2 and R1 and<br />

(b) as Team Leader for Electrical, Mechanical and Avionics systems Department. He played a key role in the<br />

NSC between 2001 and 2005. He attended the Fault Tree Analysis Workshop (19-21 November 2002). He was<br />

involved in the Zonal/Functional hazard assessment Pro-Forma process, including sign off of Hazards H73 and<br />

H34 (February to September 2004). He was the line manager for Witness K [BAE Systems]. He attended the<br />

Customer Acceptance Conference (31 August to 1 September 2004). He bears a significant responsibility for the<br />

poor planning, poor management and poor execution of the NSC. He too was prepared to see the customer be<br />

given a deliberately misleading impression as to the completeness of the work.<br />

<strong>Nimrod</strong> Safety Case 2<br />

11.170 I deal with criticisms of BAE Systems’ subsequent work in 2008-2009 on <strong>Nimrod</strong> Safety Case 2 in<br />

Chapter 15.<br />

304

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!