05.04.2013 Views

The Nimrod Review - Official Documents

The Nimrod Review - Official Documents

The Nimrod Review - Official Documents

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Nimrod</strong> 2000/MRA4<br />

2.23<br />

2.24<br />

Chapter 2 – History of the <strong>Nimrod</strong> Aircraft and Technical Description<br />

In 1993, Air Staff Requirement (ASR) 420 called for a replacement for the MR2. On 25 July 1996, the contract<br />

was awarded to BAE Systems who proposed using the existing MR2 airframes, fitting larger wings (127 feet),<br />

Rolls-Royce BMW BR.710 engines, new radar and sensor systems and a new tactical computer system. In<br />

February 1997, the first three stripped-down <strong>Nimrod</strong> fuselages were delivered to FR Aviation in Bournemouth,<br />

who were contracted to refurbish them. By 1999, however, the programme was three years behind schedule<br />

and the first prototype <strong>Nimrod</strong> MRA4 flight did not take place until 26 August 2004. In September 2004, the<br />

planned order for <strong>Nimrod</strong> MRA4 was reduced from 18 to “about 12”.<br />

<strong>The</strong> original planned in-service date for the MRA4 was April 2003, but was delayed five times and now stands<br />

at 2010. This has meant that the out-of-service date of the existing MR2 fleet has had commensurately to be<br />

put back several times and <strong>Nimrod</strong> MR2 aircraft have had to remain in service far longer than anticipated (see<br />

Chapter 14).<br />

<strong>Nimrod</strong> aircraft – technical description<br />

2.25<br />

2.26<br />

2.27<br />

<strong>The</strong> <strong>Nimrod</strong> is of a conventional aluminium alloy, semi-monocoque pressurised fuselage construction. It has<br />

a low, cantilevered monoplane wing which has a 20-degree swept-back all metal two-spar structure. It is<br />

approximately 129 ft long, 30 ft high, with a wingspan of 115 ft and wing area of 2,121 sq ft. It weighs 96,000<br />

lbs without fuel, and 184,000 lbs fully loaded with fuel and stores. It has a maximum speed of 360 kts, a service<br />

ceiling of 42,000 ft and a maximum range of about 3,800 nautical miles without AAR. It has a typical maximum<br />

flight time of eight hours on internal fuel and maximum endurance of about ten hours; this was achieved by<br />

routinely shutting down two engines for fuel economy. Flight times can be further extended to 20 hours with<br />

multiple AAR.<br />

<strong>The</strong> aircraft is powered by four Rolls-Royce RB 168-20 Spey 250 engines embedded in pairs in the root of each<br />

wing. <strong>The</strong> Spey 250 is a two-spool, low ratio, by-pass turbo-fan engine with a tubo-annular combustion system,<br />

developing 12,160 lb of thrust. An Auxiliary Power Unit (APU) is used to supply air for engine starts on the<br />

ground. <strong>The</strong> air supplied by the APU is ducted to a Cross-Feed duct running across the bomb bay between the<br />

port and starboard engines.<br />

<strong>The</strong> MR1 was designed and certified to MOD Specification No. MR 254 D&P dated 1965. MR 254 D&P accepted<br />

that the basic Comet 4C aircraft design was certificated to British Civil Airworthiness Requirements (BCAR)<br />

1956 Edition. 21 <strong>The</strong> MR2 was designed and certified to MOD Specification No MR286 D&P dated 6 May 1975.<br />

Specification No MR286 D&P accepted the same general certification base as MR 254 D&P. <strong>The</strong> change in<br />

design from a Comet 4C to a <strong>Nimrod</strong> MR1 was required to comply with AvP 970 1965 Edition (Re-issue).<br />

Fatigue and Corrosion<br />

2.28<br />

2.29<br />

<strong>The</strong> flight profiles of the <strong>Nimrod</strong> MR2s and R1s have been very different. <strong>The</strong> maritime patrol work of the<br />

<strong>Nimrod</strong> MR2 has required it to fly ‘in the weather’ and frequently at low level (200-300 feet) over the sea,<br />

causing the structure to fatigue at a faster rate than for normal cruise flight profiles. By contrast, the R1 has<br />

tended to fly only at high level and, therefore, in a structurally more benign environment. As a result, the fatigue<br />

and corrosion levels of the MR2s have been greater than the R1s. <strong>The</strong> corrosion suffered is not only evident on<br />

the structure but on some components, such as elements of the fuel system.<br />

<strong>The</strong> number of sorties and hours flown by the <strong>Nimrod</strong> types has been relatively low compared with civilian<br />

commercial aircraft. 22 This is not unusual for military aircraft.<br />

21 Section D, Issue 3, dated 1 July 1956 and Section J. Issue 2, dated 1 June 1953.<br />

22 BAE Systems in BAE Report MBU-DEF-R-NIM-SDC-076 <strong>Review</strong> of <strong>Nimrod</strong> In-Service Accident History dated September 2004 noted that the <strong>Nimrod</strong><br />

MR 2 and R 1 fleet collectively had accumulated approximately 400,000 flying hours. As at the present date, the aircraft in the fleet which have<br />

accumulated the most flying hours have flown more than 18,000 flying hours.<br />

19

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!