05.04.2013 Views

The Nimrod Review - Official Documents

The Nimrod Review - Official Documents

The Nimrod Review - Official Documents

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter 21 – New Military Airworthiness Regime<br />

Recommendation 21.B.1: <strong>The</strong> MOD shall clearly identify the three Duty Holders in each Air domain as<br />

follows:<br />

Top Level: <strong>The</strong> single Service Chiefs (CNS, 34 CGS, 35 and CAS) shall be appointed the senior<br />

(corporate) Duty Holders for the respective aircraft and personnel within their domain.<br />

AOA Level: <strong>The</strong> heads of the AOAs (the three AOCs for the RAF) shall be appointed the<br />

(operational) Duty Holders for their respective personnel and platforms who are responsible for<br />

the safe employment of the equipment usage.<br />

Unit Level: Unit Commanders shall be appointed the (delivery) Duty Holders with operating<br />

Airworthiness responsibility for personnel and platforms under their command, and who will<br />

report directly to their Aircraft Operating Authority for all ‘Duty Holder’ matters.<br />

Recommendation 21.B.2: Each Service shall appoint (a) a Chief Air Engineer to head the self-regulation<br />

of Technical Airworthiness in each of the operating authorities and (b) a Senior Operator to head the<br />

self-regulation of Operational Airworthiness and Flight Safety.<br />

21.43<br />

For the avoidance of doubt, for Recommendation 21.B.2: As regards (a), the Duty Holder, as the senior<br />

operator, will manage operational regulation with his Command and Group Staff, but will necessarily rely<br />

on a Chief Air Engineer to govern the self-regulation activity in the Engineering domain, including standards<br />

and practices and strategic engineering and support issues that cross platforms. Further, there will be no<br />

requirement for the Chief Air Engineer appointed by the AOA to be an Airworthiness Authority as this<br />

latter function will be undertaken by the Senior Engineers or their equivalents at Unit/base level, who will<br />

be responsible to their duty holder Unit/Base Commanders, and to the Regulator heading the MAA for<br />

Airworthiness compliance. Senior Engineers would be given a LOA from the Duty Holder. As regards (b), the<br />

Flight Operations/Flight Safety Service Lead will be equivalent to the Chief Air Engineer and will be responsible<br />

to the AOA for ensuring the self-regulation of the Operational Airworthiness within the AOA in addition to<br />

being the lead for the management/delivery/inspectorate of Flight Safety.<br />

Recommendation 21.B.3: Those in Duty Holder posts (Service Chief, AOA and Unit Commanders) shall<br />

have Airworthiness responsibility and authority issued by decree by the MAA. When personnel and/<br />

or aircraft are deployed on Operations in <strong>The</strong>atre, Service Chief, AOA and Unit Commanders shall<br />

retain their Duty Holder responsibilities (only) for those Airworthiness issues which remain under their<br />

control.<br />

21.44<br />

For the avoidance of doubt, for Recommendation 21.B.3: (1) When Unit Commanders’ personnel and/or<br />

aircraft are deployed on Operations in <strong>The</strong>atre, such Unit Commanders shall retain their particular Duty<br />

Holder responsibilities, e.g.: (a) to ensure the aircraft are Airworthy to deploy; (b) to ensure the personnel<br />

being deployed are sufficiently competent and trained; and (c) for continued airworthiness management<br />

(CAMO function); (2) When personnel or aircraft are deployed, the Commander Joint Operations (CJO)<br />

and <strong>The</strong>atre Commanders will not become designated Duty Holders, but will acquire a Duty of Care for the<br />

personnel and aircraft under their command for the time being similar to that of any other commander.<br />

<strong>The</strong>atre Commanders will also acquire a responsibility for the time being for regulatory compliance exercised<br />

through their nominated deployed Operations and Engineering Specialists; (3) <strong>The</strong> MAA shall provide adequate<br />

guidance/direction on the Airworthiness aspects associated with Airworthiness decisions during Operations<br />

in <strong>The</strong>atre, including setting the broad rules/requirements, e.g. regarding demonstration of having sought<br />

specialist In-<strong>The</strong>atre Type Airworthiness advice. Such guidance must recognise that Operational Commanders<br />

may be required to make operational decisions at short notice in a highly dynamic and intense environment;<br />

and (4) <strong>The</strong> MAA shall also provide adequate guidance/policy on specific Airworthiness responsibilities where<br />

UK assets/personnel are commanded by Non-UK Operational Commanders.<br />

34 Chief of Naval Staff.<br />

35 Chief of General Staff.<br />

509

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!