05.04.2013 Views

The Nimrod Review - Official Documents

The Nimrod Review - Official Documents

The Nimrod Review - Official Documents

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>The</strong> <strong>Nimrod</strong> <strong>Review</strong><br />

Summary of criticisms of the <strong>Nimrod</strong> IPT in relation to the NSC<br />

Major failures of the <strong>Nimrod</strong> IPT<br />

11.178 In my judgement a number of significant criticisms of the <strong>Nimrod</strong> IPT in relation to the NSC in the period 2002<br />

to 2005 are borne out. <strong>The</strong>re were two fundamental failures by the <strong>Nimrod</strong> IPT in particular:<br />

306<br />

(1) First, a fundamental failure of project management: the <strong>Nimrod</strong> IPT failed properly to project manage<br />

the production of the NSC by BAE Systems and, in particular, to act as an ‘intelligent customer’ when<br />

the NSC task was handed over by BAE Systems, ostensibly properly completed.<br />

(2) Second, a fundamental failure to mitigate catastrophic risks carefully: the <strong>Nimrod</strong> IPT failed carefully to<br />

sentence the large number of hazards which had been left “Open” and “Unclassified” by BAE Systems<br />

and failed to ensure that catastrophic risks were properly assessed and managed in accordance with<br />

appropriate procedures.<br />

11.179 <strong>The</strong> criticisms of the <strong>Nimrod</strong> IPT can conveniently be summarised by, and considered under, the following<br />

headings:<br />

(1) <strong>The</strong> <strong>Nimrod</strong> IPT’s attitude to the NSC was flawed from the outset: it assumed that the <strong>Nimrod</strong><br />

was ‘safe anyway’ because of its long record.<br />

(2) <strong>The</strong> <strong>Nimrod</strong> IPT inappropriately delegated the management of the NSC task to a relatively<br />

junior person without adequate oversight or supervision.<br />

(3) <strong>The</strong> <strong>Nimrod</strong> IPT failed to ensure adequate operator involvement in BAE Systems’ work on<br />

Phases 1 and 2 of the NSC.<br />

(4) <strong>The</strong> <strong>Nimrod</strong> IPT failed properly to project manage the NSC, or to act as an ‘intelligent customer’<br />

at any stage.<br />

(5) <strong>The</strong> <strong>Nimrod</strong> IPT failed to read the NSC Reports carefully or otherwise check BAE Systems’<br />

work.<br />

(6) <strong>The</strong> <strong>Nimrod</strong> IPT subsequently signed off BAE Systems’ NSC in circumstances where it was<br />

manifestly inappropriate to do so.<br />

(7) <strong>The</strong> <strong>Nimrod</strong> IPT proceeded to sentence the remaining hazards on a manifestly inappropriate<br />

and inadequate basis.<br />

(8) <strong>The</strong> <strong>Nimrod</strong> IPT failed to follow its own Safety Management Plan.<br />

(9) <strong>The</strong> <strong>Nimrod</strong> IPT failed properly to appoint an Independent Safety Auditor to audit the NSC.<br />

(10) <strong>The</strong> <strong>Nimrod</strong> IPT failed properly to manage the NSC post its production and failed to treat it as<br />

a “living” document.<br />

(11) <strong>The</strong> <strong>Nimrod</strong> IPT failed to ensure that resources within the <strong>Nimrod</strong> IPT were properly utilised to<br />

ensure the airworthiness of the <strong>Nimrod</strong> fleet and to ensure that safety and airworthiness was<br />

the first priority.<br />

11.180 <strong>The</strong> wider organisational causes of the failure of the <strong>Nimrod</strong> IPT in relation to the NSC are dealt with later in<br />

Part IV of this Report.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!