05.04.2013 Views

The Nimrod Review - Official Documents

The Nimrod Review - Official Documents

The Nimrod Review - Official Documents

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chapter 10B – <strong>Nimrod</strong> Safety Case: <strong>The</strong> Facts (Third Phase)<br />

CHAPTER 10B – NIMROD SAFETY CASE: THE FACTS<br />

(THIRD PHASE)<br />

Contents<br />

Chapter 10B deals with the Third Phase of the <strong>Nimrod</strong> Safety Case.<br />

Summary<br />

1. Chapter 10B continues the chronological story and deals with the Third Phase of the preparation<br />

of the <strong>Nimrod</strong> Safety Case by the <strong>Nimrod</strong> IPT (September 2004 to March 2005). (Chapter 10A deals<br />

with Phases 1 and 2 of the <strong>Nimrod</strong> Safety Case carried out by BAE Systems.)<br />

2. Chapter 10B explains events after the Customer Acceptance Conference (see Chapter 10A) and the<br />

handover of the six <strong>Nimrod</strong> Safety Case ‘deliverable’ reports by BAE System to the <strong>Nimrod</strong> IPT on 21<br />

September 2004.<br />

3. BAE Systems’ work on the <strong>Nimrod</strong> Safety Case was formally signed-off by the <strong>Nimrod</strong> IPT in<br />

November/December 2004. This ‘sign-off’ was supported by QinetiQ.<br />

4. Following the <strong>Nimrod</strong> IPT’s appreciation that 43 out of 105 hazards had been left “Open” by BAE<br />

Systems, it subsequently proceeded to sentence the remaining hazards itself.<br />

5. Ironically, the fact that Hazard H73 was one of the 43 hazards left “Open” by BAE Systems, meant<br />

that the <strong>Nimrod</strong> IPT had a second chance to capture the serious fire risks inherent in the Cross-Feed/<br />

Supplementary Conditioning Pack duct.<br />

6. Unfortunately, the <strong>Nimrod</strong> IPT did not grasp this opportunity: it proceeded to sentence the remaining<br />

hazards (including Hazard H73) on a manifestly inadequate, incorrect and unsatisfactory basis.<br />

7. <strong>The</strong> <strong>Nimrod</strong> IPT declared the <strong>Nimrod</strong> Safety Case completed in March 2005. 1<br />

1 See Frank Walsh’s e-mail to BAE Systems of 16 March 2005.<br />

239

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!