05.04.2013 Views

The Nimrod Review - Official Documents

The Nimrod Review - Official Documents

The Nimrod Review - Official Documents

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CHAPTER 10A – NIMROD SAFETY CASE:<br />

THE FACTS (PHASES 1 AND 2)<br />

Contents<br />

Chapter 10A – <strong>Nimrod</strong> Safety Case: <strong>The</strong> Facts (Phases 1 and 2)<br />

“<strong>The</strong>re was an element of the blind leading the blind.”<br />

(Former senior RAF officer)<br />

Chapters 10A and 10B set out the detailed chronological facts regarding the preparation of the <strong>Nimrod</strong> Safety Case.<br />

<strong>The</strong>y answer the following questions:<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

Who was responsible for drawing up the <strong>Nimrod</strong> Safety Case?<br />

When, how and by whom was it produced?<br />

What roles did each of the particular organisations and individuals play?<br />

How long did it take and how much did it cost?<br />

What did it comprise and what happened during its production?<br />

What was the end result?<br />

Chapter 10A deals with Phases 1 and 2 of the <strong>Nimrod</strong> Safety Case.<br />

Chapter 10B deals with the Third Phase.<br />

Summary<br />

1. <strong>The</strong> purpose of Safety Cases is to identify, assess and address serious risks to equipment and<br />

installations before it is too late.<br />

2. <strong>The</strong> <strong>Nimrod</strong> Safety Case should have identified the potential for the catastrophic fire which caused<br />

the loss of <strong>Nimrod</strong> XV230 in September 2006. It singularly failed to do so. <strong>The</strong> best opportunity to<br />

prevent the accident was, therefore, lost.<br />

3. <strong>The</strong> <strong>Nimrod</strong> Safety Case took a total of nearly four years to produce (April 2001 to March 2005) and<br />

cost in excess of £400,000.<br />

4. Three organisations were involved in drawing up the <strong>Nimrod</strong> Safety Case:<br />

BAE Systems, which was the ‘Design Authority’ for the <strong>Nimrod</strong> aircraft and formally tasked by<br />

the <strong>Nimrod</strong> IPT to draw up a Safety Case for the two aircraft types, <strong>Nimrod</strong> MR2 and R1;<br />

<strong>The</strong> <strong>Nimrod</strong> IPT, which was the ‘Integrated Project Team’ within the MOD Defence Logistics<br />

Organisation with specific responsibility for the <strong>Nimrod</strong> MR2 and R1 fleets; and<br />

QinetiQ, which acted as ‘Independent Advisor’ to the <strong>Nimrod</strong> IPT in relation to the <strong>Nimrod</strong><br />

Safety Case.<br />

5. <strong>The</strong> <strong>Nimrod</strong> Safety Case was drawn up in three phases:<br />

5.1 Phase 1 conducted by BAE Systems (April 2001 to April 2003): Following initial scoping and<br />

formalisation of Phase 1 of the <strong>Nimrod</strong> Safety Case task, BAE Systems carried out zonal inspections<br />

of <strong>Nimrod</strong> aircraft at RAF Kinloss and RAF Waddington and delivered a ‘hazard identification’<br />

Report to the <strong>Nimrod</strong> IPT in April 2003. 1<br />

1 BAE Systems <strong>Nimrod</strong> MR Mk2-Baseline Safety Case (Phase 1) Zonal Hazard Analysis Report Reference: MBU-DEF-R-NIM-FS00538, dated<br />

April 2003.<br />

189

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!