05.04.2013 Views

The Nimrod Review - Official Documents

The Nimrod Review - Official Documents

The Nimrod Review - Official Documents

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>The</strong> <strong>Nimrod</strong> <strong>Review</strong><br />

388<br />

D Tech<br />

AD(Eng)Pol<br />

SofS Defence<br />

CDL CGS CNS<br />

DGES(Air)<br />

Letters of delegation<br />

Letters of delegation<br />

FLC<br />

Cluster Leaders<br />

1 Group<br />

Cluster Leaders<br />

2 Group<br />

Letters IPTLs/ of delegation PEs<br />

CAS CDP<br />

Letters of delegation<br />

Letters of delegation<br />

Figure. 13.5: Letters of Delegation Chain(s) in DLO<br />

DASMS, DASSRR, JATAAM, DASC and ‘virtual’ MAA.<br />

13.134<br />

13.135<br />

13.136<br />

13.137<br />

By 2005, the DASC Joint <strong>Review</strong> of Airworthiness was already beginning to conclude that the complexity of<br />

the MoD’s aviation organisation, compounded by successive organisational changes, meant that the structure<br />

of airworthiness regulation and delegation was convoluted, easily misunderstood and contained a number of<br />

weaknesses (see above). It recommended a two phase solution:<br />

<strong>The</strong> first phase included the replacement of the DASC Airworthiness Branch with a Safety Management<br />

System Branch, the introduction of a pan-Defence Aviation Safety Management System (DASMS) and the<br />

introduction of a Defence Aviation Safety Strategic Risk Register (DASSRR). <strong>The</strong>se recommendations were<br />

actioned.<br />

<strong>The</strong> second phase was to be a review of pan-Defence aviation management that might lead to the creation<br />

of a Military Aviation Authority (MAA). This recommendation was reinforced when the new Chief of Defence<br />

Logistics (CDL) and the head of Airworthiness Design Requirements and Procedures (ADRP), wrote to the Vice<br />

Chief of the Defence Staff (VCDS) in June 2005 asking him to consider the requirement for a MAA. A MAA<br />

Study team was formed, and, in December 2005, it reported that:<br />

a. A stand-alone MAA was not required, but this should be reviewed in two years. <strong>The</strong> Study envisaged<br />

a ‘virtual’ MAA in which the functions, structure and management would be clearly identified, but the<br />

components would not necessarily be collocated.<br />

b. <strong>The</strong> DASC and the MoD Aviation Regulatory Team (MART) 50 should be co-located. (This co-location<br />

occurred in April 2008 when the DASC and the MART merged to form the Directorate of Aviation<br />

Regulation and Safety (DARS)).<br />

c. A separate study was required to examine options for the better management of MOD air traffic and<br />

airspace issues. It was envisaged that Airspace and Air Traffic Management policy and regulation could<br />

be brought under a single organisation: a proposed MOD Directorate of Joint Air Traffic and Airspace<br />

Management (JATAM).<br />

<strong>The</strong> implementation of the MAA and JATAM Studies was, however, delayed due to a variety of reasons<br />

including debates over terms of reference, leadership, ‘dual-hatting’ and interactions with other Government<br />

Departments, together with constraints on physical locations due to estate rationalisation.<br />

50 <strong>The</strong> MART was located at RNAS Yeovilton in Somerset, under the line management of Director Air Staff.<br />

DAWS

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!