05.04.2013 Views

The Nimrod Review - Official Documents

The Nimrod Review - Official Documents

The Nimrod Review - Official Documents

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>The</strong> <strong>Nimrod</strong> <strong>Review</strong><br />

78<br />

5.27<br />

to have been that, once fitted, fuel seals could be left in place indefinitely. For example, the Defence Equipment<br />

& Support “<strong>Review</strong> of Lifing and Maintenance Policy for Aircraft Systems Seals” dated 22 November 2007 refers<br />

to anecdotal evidence of 55-year old Nitrile seals which had remained in oil for their fitted life being “in perfect<br />

condition.” 23 Whilst this may be true, it must be balanced against the equally valid fact that clearly some fuel<br />

seals do not last anything like 55 years. <strong>The</strong> focus of any concern should be on early and medium failures, not<br />

just those that survive to a ripe old age.<br />

RAPRA Technology Ltd conducted research in 2000 into the effect of age on elastomeric material performance,<br />

but only up to the age of 40 years. 24 Although this paper concluded that: “none of the materials (elastomers<br />

exposed to differing climates over a period of 40 years) has deteriorated to such a degree as to be totally<br />

unusable”, 25 it also noted that: “many rubbers aged in the compressed condition, particularly in the hot climates,<br />

have set to such an extent after less than 40 years that their ability to act as an efficient seal is very doubtful”. 26<br />

A study by QinetiQ27 in 2007 of the relevant literature concerning Thiokol (the material used in the FRS Series<br />

1 fuel seals before its replacement with Nitrile) suggested that it could suffer temperature-related degradation;<br />

the DDP for FRS110 Series 1 seals specifies a maximum temperature of 70oC. 5.28 This conclusion was reiterated by QinetiQ in its later report in 2007 into the “Removal and Examination of Fuel<br />

Seals from <strong>Nimrod</strong> XV236”. 28 QinetiQ considered that two different ageing mechanisms were likely to occur<br />

during the life of a polysulphide seal: the first being ambient temperature ageing, such as will occur in store or<br />

when used in benign temperature conditions; and the second being elevated temperature ageing, which will<br />

occur when the seals are exposed to high temperature environments. QinetiQ’s conclusion was that ageing<br />

effects and thermal degradation initially cause hardening and lack of resilience, and that continued exposure to<br />

heat (especially to temperatures above 70°C) can cause significant softening of the seal.<br />

5.29<br />

5.30<br />

Work by the US Defence materials experts, Advance Materials Manufacturing and Testing Information Analysis<br />

Center (AMPTIAC) 29 in 2003 on the service life of elastomeric seals, also suggests that the chemical structures,<br />

and thus the physical properties of elastomers, degrade over time. Ageing can be inhibited or accelerate,<br />

depending on the environmental conditions surrounding an elastomer. Ageing usually takes place under such<br />

conditions as heat, sunlight, oxygen, ozone, moisture or stress; and the rate of ageing is dependent on the<br />

amount of exposure to these factors. Such conditions will degrade the properties either by causing additional<br />

cross-linking or by chain scission. Ageing is an irreversible process. 30<br />

<strong>The</strong> inconvenient truth is thus that elastomeric seals do age. <strong>The</strong> problem is that this process is not yet well<br />

enough understood.<br />

(2) Misalignment<br />

5.31<br />

31 A number of leaking seals from <strong>Nimrod</strong>s have been subject to detailed analysis since the loss of XV230. In the<br />

case of the FRS Thiokol and Nitrile seals, the principal cause of degradation appears to be stress relaxation (i.e.<br />

where the stress required to subject a material to a fixed deformation decreases with time), possibly caused by<br />

a combination of high temperature and coupling misalignment. Specific limitations are detailed for the angular<br />

displacement between pipes connected by couplings and for the distances between pipes and the coupling<br />

assembly. 32 In many instances where couplings have been observed to leak, the assembly has been found to be<br />

outwith the specified limits.<br />

23 DE&S(WYT)/365/8/2/CASD, page 7.<br />

24 Natural Ageing of Rubber, RAPRA Technology Ltd, 2000.<br />

25 Ibid, page 8.<br />

26 Ibid, page 10.<br />

27 <strong>Nimrod</strong> Fuel Seals, Literature Survey, Issue 1, September 2007.<br />

28 QinetiQ/EMEA/S&DU/CR0703772/2.0 dated November 2007.<br />

29 AMMTIAC Report dated April 2003: pages 21 to 25 deal with the service life of elastomeric seals.<br />

30 Ibid, paragraph 5.12: Ageing.<br />

31 QinetiQ Reports: Examination of Fuel Seal from <strong>Nimrod</strong> XV260, dated August 2007; Removal and Examination of Fuel Seals from <strong>Nimrod</strong> XV236,<br />

Issue 2, dated 2007 ; and Examination of Original Avimo Fuel Seals from <strong>Nimrod</strong> XV240, Issue 1, dated June 2008.<br />

32 Chapter 41-20 of Air Publication (AP) 101B-0503-1DK dated August 2002 and AP 106D-4402-13A. See also the revised DDP published by Eaton<br />

Aerospace after the XV230 incident dated 18 October 2007.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!