05.03.2013 Views

Sociolinguistics and Language Education.pdf

Sociolinguistics and Language Education.pdf

Sociolinguistics and Language Education.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

10 Part 1: <strong>Language</strong> <strong>and</strong> Ideology<br />

the ways in which particular educational institutions mediate the infl uence<br />

of language-related beliefs <strong>and</strong> practices on local educational policies in<br />

Philadelphia <strong>and</strong> the Andean region (Hornberger & Johnson, 2007). The<br />

varied linguistic, geographic, social <strong>and</strong> educational foci of this research<br />

represent a rich resource for language researchers <strong>and</strong> teachers desirous of<br />

exp<strong>and</strong>ing their grasp of the nature, power, <strong>and</strong> infl uence of language ideologies<br />

in education.<br />

Research on language ideologies is interdisciplinary as well as both diachronic<br />

<strong>and</strong> synchronic. Beliefs about language have been investigated by<br />

scholars from many disciplines using research methods that correspond to<br />

their training, disciplinary traditions <strong>and</strong> access to sources of information.<br />

In what follows, I present a brief survey of research approaches used to<br />

investigate language-related beliefs <strong>and</strong> interpretations over the past fi ve<br />

decades, along with some examples of current investigations. The ‘quantitative/qualitative’<br />

distinction provides a convenient organizational<br />

strategy, with one proviso: this dichotomy implies far too simple a contrast<br />

to capture the nuances of both data <strong>and</strong> argument in many recent <strong>and</strong><br />

some earlier studies, which often combine research methods <strong>and</strong> data<br />

sources in the interest of more comprehensive <strong>and</strong> enlightening treatment<br />

of a particular topic. For example, Zhou <strong>and</strong> Bankston’s (1998) account of<br />

Vietnamese adaptation to life in a minority community in New Orleans is<br />

an extended case study that used participant observation, intensive interviews<br />

<strong>and</strong> direct surveys of high schools students, along with analysis of<br />

numerous secondary sources such as archival records, related opinion<br />

polls, data from the US census <strong>and</strong> other government agencies, <strong>and</strong> results<br />

of Louisiana’s high school graduation tests. Each research approach <strong>and</strong><br />

all studies summarized illuminate aspects of beliefs about language, provide<br />

valuable descriptive insights on the nature of ‘situated policy enactments’<br />

(Ramanathan & Morgan, 2007), <strong>and</strong> raise further questions about<br />

the complexity of social forces driving individual <strong>and</strong> institutional language<br />

choices <strong>and</strong> optimal instructional practices that promote effective<br />

language learning, all areas of major import to educators.<br />

Quantitative Research on <strong>Language</strong> Attitudes<br />

Social psychological studies <strong>and</strong> some current examples<br />

Certain themes in current scholarship on language ideologies overlap<br />

to an often-overlooked degree with social–psychological research on language<br />

attitudes conducted since the 1960s. While it may seem odd to<br />

include ‘classic’ attitudinal research when considering work on language<br />

ideologies, inclusion is justifi ed for this volume because both streams of<br />

investigation help to identify the many infl uences on language use <strong>and</strong><br />

language learning, core concerns for teachers. Furthermore, attitudes,<br />

such as ideologies, are very often latent; that is, they are not always stated

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!