05.03.2013 Views

Sociolinguistics and Language Education.pdf

Sociolinguistics and Language Education.pdf

Sociolinguistics and Language Education.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

328 Part 4: <strong>Language</strong> <strong>and</strong> Literacy<br />

<strong>and</strong> classroom interactions. Kress <strong>and</strong> van Leeuwen (2001), in particular,<br />

are highly accomplished at examining the ways in which teachers<br />

‘ orchestrate’ <strong>and</strong>/or activate modes in their lessons for specifi c designbased<br />

purposes. The case of David, a science teacher, exemplifi es the<br />

choices made in arranging <strong>and</strong> sequencing content when explaining the<br />

fl ow of blood in the human body:<br />

In elaborating the newly complex model in speech, [David] used<br />

gestures (mode: gesture) to make signs indicating the pumping action<br />

of the heart (rhythmically pushing his semi-raised arms against his<br />

body), <strong>and</strong> in repeating [his] account of the blood’s circulation, using<br />

[a] diagram, he both used his h<strong>and</strong>s to indicate the motion of the blood<br />

(mode: gesture) <strong>and</strong> at the same time wrote names as labels on parts<br />

of the diagram: ‘The blood moves around the body, from the heart to<br />

the lungs, to the small intestine, to the cells, to the . . .’ (mode: language<br />

as writing). (Kress & van Leeuwen, 2001: 52–53)<br />

Third, the ways in which modes are understood as meaning-making<br />

resources <strong>and</strong> how the relationships between modes are best represented,<br />

particularly in prose, require important theory building. By way of illustration,<br />

Unsworth (2006) explores how language, image, audio <strong>and</strong> hypertext<br />

can be analyzed to highlight the story-makers’ art. Part of this process<br />

involves mapping various types of electronic or e-narratives (E-stories for<br />

early learners, linear e-narratives, E-narratives <strong>and</strong> interactive story contexts,<br />

hypertext narratives <strong>and</strong> hypermedia narratives) onto a framework<br />

of compositional features expressed as continua (Unsworth, 2006: 89):<br />

• Linear ↔ Hyperlinked<br />

• Monomodal ↔ Multimodal<br />

• Still images ↔ Animation<br />

• Receptive ↔ Interactive<br />

• Fictive ↔ Metafi ctive<br />

Unsworth contends that the most innovative of his categories of digital<br />

fi ction are hypermedia narratives, which stimulate ‘re-creative’, interpretive<br />

reading; see, for example, Childhood in Richmond, accessible from<br />

http://wordcircuits.com/gallery/childhood/index.html. However, it is<br />

also noted that linear e-narratives can be just as engaging. What is crucial<br />

here is developing students’ appreciation of the nature of digital storytelling<br />

by making explicit how the affordances of modes are used to achieve<br />

varying narrative effects. Unsworth’s conceptualizations assist greatly in<br />

this educative process as they provide a vocabulary for describing <strong>and</strong><br />

analyzing the compositional features of digital fi ction.<br />

Furthermore, once e-literature is described <strong>and</strong> understood structurally,<br />

a basis is provided for its assessment in classrooms. For example,<br />

putting aside matters relating to the appropriateness of subject matter, the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!