05.03.2013 Views

Sociolinguistics and Language Education.pdf

Sociolinguistics and Language Education.pdf

Sociolinguistics and Language Education.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

318 Part 4: <strong>Language</strong> <strong>and</strong> Literacy<br />

skills, the school system in India does not. Having said this about<br />

Singapore, this chapter will show that mere access is a necessary but not<br />

suffi cient condition for teachers to teach multimodal literacy.<br />

One of the key issues regarding new literacy practices is whether or not<br />

<strong>and</strong> how they should be integrated into the language classroom so as to<br />

enhance the learning experiences of students. An equally important issue<br />

is that of equitable access to technology. Yet another issue relates to what<br />

Le<strong>and</strong>er <strong>and</strong> Lewis (2008) call sociality, which refers to issues of identity<br />

<strong>and</strong> group membership in CMC. Finally there are issues of measuring<br />

how literacy has been enhanced or altered, <strong>and</strong> exactly which aspects of<br />

language <strong>and</strong> literacy acquisition have been enhanced or altered, through<br />

the use of technology.<br />

This chapter explores these <strong>and</strong> related issues through the lens of multimodal<br />

literacy. At the outset we would like to situate our subject in the<br />

discipline of sociolinguistics. Janks (this volume) writes that a socio-<br />

cultural approach to language education refers variously to critical literacy,<br />

critical language awareness, critical applied linguistics, New Literacy<br />

Studies <strong>and</strong> multimodal literacies or multiliteracies. She traces the fi eld of<br />

‘critical literacy’ as theorized practice via four points in time: critical literacy,<br />

critical linguistics, multiliteracies, <strong>and</strong> literacy <strong>and</strong> space. Finally, she<br />

indicates that multiliteracies is an approach to literacy studies, which<br />

includes the re-examination of meaning-making in an age where visual<br />

modes of representation are in the ascendancy. This chapter is consistent<br />

with Janks’s overviews of multiliteracies <strong>and</strong> multimodal literacy as<br />

approaches pertinent to the fi eld of critical literacy.<br />

We begin with a section that defi nes the terminology currently used in<br />

our adopted approaches. Thereafter, we look at what might be considered<br />

the main goals of multimodal literacy <strong>and</strong> report research fi ndings in a<br />

review of literature on multimodal literacy practices, language classrooms,<br />

<strong>and</strong> teacher education. As part of the research fi ndings, we focus on the<br />

Technology in English (TIE) project, which was completed by the Learning<br />

Sciences Laboratory at Singapore’s National Institute of <strong>Education</strong> in<br />

February 2009. We use preliminary fi ndings from this project to explore<br />

links between research <strong>and</strong> practice in the language classroom. Finally, we<br />

conclude the chapter with a look at under-researched topics in this fi eld,<br />

which need more attention not only from the international academic community<br />

but also from teachers who face challenges posed by technology in<br />

their daily teaching <strong>and</strong> policy makers who want national school systems<br />

to be highly wired.<br />

Defi nition of Key Terms<br />

In this section we describe the way scholars refer to technology, multimodality<br />

<strong>and</strong> multiliteracies <strong>and</strong> other related terms.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!