05.03.2013 Views

Sociolinguistics and Language Education.pdf

Sociolinguistics and Language Education.pdf

Sociolinguistics and Language Education.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

516 Part 6: <strong>Language</strong> <strong>and</strong> Interaction<br />

06 thought about this.uh done about this.<br />

07 A: ohh I think for a number of reasons<br />

08 they didn’t speak up I- uh-uh one it’s<br />

09 not sure whe:ther: you know journalists<br />

10 are comfortable sorta turning in each<br />

11 other.<br />

12 (.)<br />

13 I don’t know to what degree that’s sort<br />

14 of a:: you know written pact maybe they<br />

15 don’t do it<br />

Although she has opportunity to do so at line 12, the interviewer does<br />

not correct or in any other way orient to this grammatical stumble. In their<br />

paper on the organization of repair, Schegloff et al. accounted for the paucity<br />

of such corrections by noting:<br />

When the hearing/underst<strong>and</strong>ing of a turn is adequate to the production<br />

of a correction by ‘other’, it is adequate to allow production of a<br />

sequentially appropriate next turn. Under that circumstance, the<br />

turn’s recipient (‘other’) should produce the next turn, not the correction<br />

(<strong>and</strong>, overwhelmingly, that is what is done). Therein lies another<br />

basis for the empirical paucity of other-corrections: those who could<br />

do them do a sequentially appropriate next turn instead. (Schegloff<br />

et al., 1977: 380)<br />

In the contexts Schegloff et al. (1977) analyze then, the production of<br />

sequentially appropriate next turns (one manifestation of the principle of<br />

progressivity; see Schegloff, 2007: 14–15) is typically prioritized relative<br />

to correcting otherwise adequate prior turns-at-talk.<br />

However, in the context of language learning, ‘correctness’ takes on a<br />

pedagogical importance <strong>and</strong> these priorities may be reversed. That is, a<br />

st<strong>and</strong>ard of ‘correct’ replaces a st<strong>and</strong>ard of ‘good-enough’, which is typical<br />

of ordinary conversation. Kurhila (2005) shows that the repair of grammatical<br />

forms is overwhelmingly initiated by the non-native speakers in NS–<br />

NNS interaction. An example from her research is included as (25) below:<br />

(25) Kurhila<br />

In data from NS–NNS of Finnish, NNS has been telling a story about<br />

two babies who were mixed up in a birth clinic<br />

001 NNS: .hhhh Sitte he (0.2) huomaa huomu- huom-huoma =<br />

then they notice + PRS + 3<br />

.hhhh Then they notice notid- noti- notic =<br />

002 NS: =Jo [o houmas ]<br />

ye [s notice + PST +3<br />

=Ye [s noticed]

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!