05.03.2013 Views

Sociolinguistics and Language Education.pdf

Sociolinguistics and Language Education.pdf

Sociolinguistics and Language Education.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Sociolinguistics</strong>, <strong>Language</strong> Teaching <strong>and</strong> New Literacy Studies 291<br />

has been developed <strong>and</strong> in this chapter we will give examples of the<br />

strengths <strong>and</strong> weaknesses of the approach. Key research fi ndings <strong>and</strong><br />

directions for further research include the recognition that learning literacy,<br />

particularly academic literacy, in socially <strong>and</strong> linguistically diverse<br />

educational contexts involves more than learning language as structure<br />

<strong>and</strong> literacy as a set of generic skills <strong>and</strong> fi xed genres. We will explore the<br />

relevance of these fi ndings for teachers <strong>and</strong> students as they engage in<br />

classroom interaction. Classroom examples will be used to illustrate our<br />

arguments where appropriate. We will draw particular conclusions for<br />

additional/second language education <strong>and</strong> bilingual education as well as<br />

for mainstream classroom teachers.<br />

Social Theories of <strong>Language</strong><br />

In the fi eld of language studies <strong>and</strong> in particular of language education,<br />

<strong>and</strong> as we shall see below, with respect to literacy studies, there has recently<br />

been a shift away from dominant assumptions that language could be conceptualised<br />

<strong>and</strong> taught as though it were independent of social context. We<br />

will mainly draw upon two lines of developments in describing this shift.<br />

The fi rst is the body of work broadly associated with ethnography of communication.<br />

In this respect, the work of Hymes <strong>and</strong> the Ethnography of<br />

Communication tradition has infl uenced not only how language is conceptualised<br />

for language education, but also how the social can be taken into<br />

account in complex linguistic <strong>and</strong> educational environments. The second is<br />

the development of systemic functional linguistics (SFL), with particular<br />

reference to the work of Halliday <strong>and</strong> his colleagues. The fundamental<br />

insight of SFL has been that the use of language is itself a constitutive part<br />

of social action <strong>and</strong> that linguistic resources, for example lexis <strong>and</strong> grammar,<br />

themselves embody social meaning.<br />

We will briefl y indicate where these currents in sociolinguistics have<br />

fed into language teaching <strong>and</strong> the role of literacies. In this discussion the<br />

term ‘language teaching’ is used broadly; examples will be drawn from<br />

the teaching of a language to students for whom it is not their mother<br />

tongue, for example English as a foreign language in Japan or English as<br />

an additional/second language in Australia for linguistic minority students,<br />

as well as the teaching of mother tongue. The context of teaching<br />

will be made explicit where appropriate. The fi rst half of this discussion<br />

will be taken up by a largely descriptive account of the points of contact<br />

between sociolinguistics <strong>and</strong> language teaching.<br />

<strong>Sociolinguistics</strong> in Communicative <strong>Language</strong> Teaching<br />

The development of the concept of Communicative <strong>Language</strong> Teaching<br />

(CLT) was generally associated with a break with the grammar-focused

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!