05.03.2013 Views

Sociolinguistics and Language Education.pdf

Sociolinguistics and Language Education.pdf

Sociolinguistics and Language Education.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

458 Part 6: <strong>Language</strong> <strong>and</strong> Interaction<br />

• Culture as communication: Approaches include structuralist (Lévi-<br />

Strauss, 1978) <strong>and</strong> interpretive semiotics (Geertz, 1973), indexicality<br />

<strong>and</strong> metapragmatics (Silverstein, 1993) <strong>and</strong> metaphors as folk theories<br />

(Lakoff & Johnson, 1980).<br />

• Culture as a system of mediation: Culture comprises sets of physical<br />

<strong>and</strong> symbolic objects that mediate between people <strong>and</strong> their environment.<br />

<strong>Language</strong> is a critical tool of symbolic mediation (Vygotsky,<br />

1978) <strong>and</strong> language practices are understood as mediating activity.<br />

• Culture as a system of practices: Replacing generalizing <strong>and</strong><br />

abstracted concepts of culture as unitary, stable <strong>and</strong> ahistorical structures<br />

of meanings <strong>and</strong> behavior, poststructuralist practice theories<br />

emphasize the constructive role of language <strong>and</strong> action in concrete<br />

social circumstances. Central to Bourdieu’s theory of practice (1977)<br />

is the notion of habitus, a bundle of socially sanctioned, historically<br />

developed, internalized dispositions for institutionalized, routinized<br />

socio-discursive practices.<br />

• Culture as a system of participation: Participation centers on the connectivity<br />

of language-mediated actions to the local <strong>and</strong> global world,<br />

based on shared cognitive, symbolic <strong>and</strong> material resources, including<br />

inequitable access <strong>and</strong> obstacles to participation. Infl uential analytical<br />

concepts of participation (Goffman, 1981; H.M. Goodwin,<br />

1990; Philips, 1972) in situated activities shed light on the local construction<br />

of engagement in discursive practices.<br />

As this overview suggests, a distinctive difference between theories of<br />

culture is whether they conceptualize their object as an abstract, autonomous<br />

cognitive system that underlies observable behaviors or as discursively<br />

mediated, context-sensitive <strong>and</strong> context-shaping social actions. In a<br />

similar vein, language has been theorized as an abstract, autonomous,<br />

conventionalized symbolic system of internal meaning <strong>and</strong> form relations<br />

(Saussure’s langue), as competence, a cognitive capacity distinct from performance,<br />

but also as language use in situated socio-communicative<br />

actions, as a form of social practice (Bakhtin, 1981; Bourdieu, 1977;<br />

Vološinov, 1973). With the view of language as action <strong>and</strong> use, the indexical<br />

character of semiotic systems becomes more prominent: whereas a symbolic,<br />

representational view underst<strong>and</strong>s the relationship between<br />

linguistic form <strong>and</strong> meaning as stable <strong>and</strong> fi xed, indexicality describes<br />

the fundamental dependency of meaning on contexts of language use<br />

(Levinson, 1983; Silverstein, 2003; Wittgenstein, 1953). As we will see<br />

below, indexicality is a key topic in the study of interaction between<br />

culturally diverse participants.<br />

Based on the discussion so far, we can suggest that the place where<br />

culture <strong>and</strong> language meet is participants’ engagement in discursively<br />

mediated social practices. To be sure, such practices include the conceptual

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!