05.03.2013 Views

Sociolinguistics and Language Education.pdf

Sociolinguistics and Language Education.pdf

Sociolinguistics and Language Education.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Classroom Discourse Analysis 529<br />

regularly employed in the community in the course of socially signifi cant<br />

interaction’ (Gumperz, 1971: 184).<br />

Gumperz initially coined the term ‘verbal repertoire’ to address the<br />

massive variety of languages deployed in multilingual communities<br />

within India. By doing so, he reconceptualized the object of linguistic<br />

study, illustrating that the term linguists traditionally used to demarcate<br />

communities of speakers, ‘language’, was descriptively inadequate in a<br />

setting of societal multilingualism (cf. Sridhar, 1996). His insights have since<br />

been generalized to monolingual communities as well. This conceptualization<br />

makes it clear that all communities have a range of varieties that<br />

are functionally distinct <strong>and</strong> appropriate in different kinds of social events.<br />

Individuals’ communicative repertoires may include multiple languages,<br />

or may consist primarily of a range of varieties within a language.<br />

In this chapter, I want, like Gumperz, to emphasize the signifi cant contributions<br />

of social situation <strong>and</strong> communicative goals to an individual’s<br />

language use – whether that speaker is described as multilingual or monolingual.<br />

I also try to capture the centrality of an individual’s communicative<br />

goals by using the slightly modifi ed phrase, ‘communicative repertoire’.<br />

This term differs slightly from ‘verbal repertoire’ in that it focuses on the<br />

resources deployed by individuals, rather than attempting to generalize<br />

about the ‘verbal repertoire’ of ‘the community’ of speakers.<br />

An individual’s communicative repertoires are inevitably more developed<br />

in one social realm <strong>and</strong> more limited in another. Like a pianist who<br />

may have an expansive ‘classical repertoire’, but a limited repertoire of<br />

‘folk songs’ or ‘jazz’, an individual speaker may have a well-developed<br />

‘academic’ repertoire, but a very limited ‘football fan’ or ‘blind date’ repertoire.<br />

A two-year-old may have a vast repertoire that is functionally<br />

communicative with her mother, but she may not be considered a viable<br />

communication partner in many other contexts – a university seminar for<br />

example. Nevertheless, even a two-year-old is developing distinct repertoires<br />

for different social contexts <strong>and</strong> will have a different repertoire for<br />

speaking with her mother than she uses at day care or with her older<br />

brothers.<br />

Human development across the life span consists in large part of the<br />

growing awareness <strong>and</strong> accumulation of such communicative repertoires<br />

<strong>and</strong> the effects they have (Bruner, 1983). This is true for babies, as they<br />

take increasingly active roles in the various communicative realms in<br />

which they participate; it is also true for every living being who moves in<br />

<strong>and</strong> out of different social settings with varying communicative expectations.<br />

Wolfe (2004) entertainingly captures this in his novel of collegiate<br />

life, I am Charlotte Simmons. In this fi ctional world, all characters struggle<br />

to fi nd their voice in the prestigious environs of ‘Dupont University’. In<br />

the following passage, Charlotte, a scholarship girl from Southern

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!