02.09.2013 Views

Child Pornography - Home | National Rapporteur on Trafficking in ...

Child Pornography - Home | National Rapporteur on Trafficking in ...

Child Pornography - Home | National Rapporteur on Trafficking in ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

202<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>Child</str<strong>on</strong>g> PornograPhy First report oF the Dutch NatioNal rapporteur<br />

Usually (<strong>in</strong> 59% of cases), n<strong>on</strong>-suspended community service orders have a term of between 121 and 240<br />

hours. 38% of cases <strong>in</strong>volve a shorter term, and 32 cases <strong>in</strong>volve a fully suspended community service<br />

order. In 2009 and 2010, community service orders with a l<strong>on</strong>ger term were imposed more often than<br />

<strong>in</strong> preced<strong>in</strong>g years.<br />

Cases settled <strong>in</strong> first <strong>in</strong>stance <strong>in</strong> which an appeal was lodged<br />

Figure 3.20 shows the development of the percentage of cases settled <strong>in</strong> first <strong>in</strong>stance <strong>in</strong> the period<br />

between 2005 and 2010 per year <strong>in</strong> which an appeal was lodged, <strong>in</strong> relati<strong>on</strong> to the total number of cases<br />

settled <strong>in</strong> first <strong>in</strong>stance. 480 The party which lodged the appeal is also displayed. 481<br />

Figure 3.20 Cases settled <strong>in</strong> first <strong>in</strong>stance <strong>in</strong> which an appeal was lodged (2005-2010)<br />

100%<br />

90%<br />

80%<br />

70%<br />

60%<br />

50%<br />

40%<br />

30%<br />

20%<br />

10%<br />

0%<br />

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010<br />

Year<br />

By both parties<br />

Only by the suspect<br />

Only by the public<br />

prosecutor<br />

An appeal was lodged <strong>in</strong> 351 (20%) of the total 1796 cases settled <strong>in</strong> first <strong>in</strong>stance. This was usually (partly)<br />

lodged by the suspect (12% by the suspect +2% by both the suspect as well as the public prosecutor). In the<br />

period between 2005 and 2009, the percentage of cases <strong>in</strong> which an appeal was lodged varies between 13%<br />

<strong>in</strong> 2006 and 22% <strong>in</strong> 2009. In 2010, both the public prosecutor and the suspect lodged an appeal <strong>in</strong> a c<strong>on</strong>siderably<br />

greater number of cases than <strong>in</strong> the previous years, <strong>in</strong> 31% of cases. It is possible that this is partly<br />

the result of previously-stated recent developments (fewer prosecuti<strong>on</strong>s and more severe sentences).<br />

3.5.4.3 Cases settled <strong>on</strong> appeal <strong>in</strong> figures<br />

Number of child pornography cases settled <strong>on</strong> appeal<br />

Figure 3.21 shows the development of the number of cases settled <strong>on</strong> appeal <strong>in</strong> the period from<br />

2005-2009. 482,483<br />

480 The figures have been corrected to take <strong>in</strong>to account appeals that were lodged at a later stage.<br />

481 Please refer to Appendix 4, Table B4.19 for the table c<strong>on</strong>ta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the complete summary of this data.<br />

482 Please note: for the figures relat<strong>in</strong>g to higher appeal orig<strong>in</strong>at<strong>in</strong>g from the Investigati<strong>on</strong> and Policy<br />

Database Judicial Documentati<strong>on</strong>, figures <strong>on</strong>ly up to and <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g the year 2009 are displayed (see<br />

Appendix 2: Justificati<strong>on</strong> of the research methods employed: 2. Public Prosecuti<strong>on</strong> Service data & Investigati<strong>on</strong><br />

and Policy Database Judicial Documentati<strong>on</strong> research.)<br />

483 Please refer to Appendix 4, Table B4.20 for the table c<strong>on</strong>ta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the complete summary of this data<br />

(<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dex figures and the growth <strong>in</strong> relati<strong>on</strong> to the previous year).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!