Child Pornography - Home | National Rapporteur on Trafficking in ...

0 Overview of figures and tables
Figure 0.1 Perpetrators, victims and technology 25
Figure 1.1 Moran’s pyramid model 73
Figure 3.1 Annual number of reports to the Hotline Combating <strong>Child</strong> <strong>Pornography</strong>
on the Internet – including content reported in duplicate (2005-2010) 150
Figure 3.2 Annual reports – including content reported in duplicate – according to
place where found 151
Figure 3.3 Proportion of unique reports relating to child abuse material compared
with the total number of unique reports (2007-2010) 152
Figure 3.4 Proportion of unique reports of child abuse material on servers hosted in
the Netherlands compared with the total number of unique reports of child
abuse material (2005-2010) 152
Figure 3.5 Gender distribution amongst victims depicted in the incidences of child
abuse material
on servers in the Netherlands that were reported in 2010 153
Figure 3.6 Age distribution amongst victims depicted in the incidences of child abuse
material on servers in the Netherlands that were reported in 2010 154
Figure 3.7 Number of cases registered with the Public Prosecution Service (2005-2010) 191
Figure 3.8 Cases registered in each district court public prosecutor’s office (total 2005-2010) 191
Figure 3.9 Nature of the registered cases (2005-2010) 192
Figure 3.10 Registered cases by gravest offences (2005-2010) 194
Figure 3.11 Registered cases and preventive detention (2005-2010) 195
Figure 3.12 Number of cases concluded by the Public Prosecution Service (2005-2010) 195
Figure 3.13 Concluded cases by type of settlement (2005-2010) 196
Figure 3.14 Number of cases concluded in first instance (2005-2010) 197
Figure 3.15 Cases settled in first instance by type of settlement (2005-2010) 198
Figure 3.16 Convictions in first instance by severity of charges (2005-2010) 199
Figure 3.17 Convictions in first instance according to sentence imposed (2005-2010) 199
Figure 3.18 Non-suspended or partially-suspended custodial sentences handed down
in the first instance according to term category (2005-2010) 201
Figure 3.19 Community service orders handed down in first instance according
to term category 201
Figure 3.20 Cases settled in first instance in which an appeal was lodged (2005-2010) 202
Figure 3.21 Number of cases settled on appeal (2005-2009) 203
Figure 3.22 Cases settled on appeal according to settlement type (total 2005-2009) 203
Figure 3.23 Convictions on appeal according to sentence imposed (total 2005-2009) 204