Child Pornography - Home | National Rapporteur on Trafficking in ...

320
<strong>Child</strong> PornograPhy First report oF the Dutch NatioNal rapporteur
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Total Top 5
N % N % N % N % N % N % N % R
Utrecht 35 7% 28 7% 21 5% 18 5% 55 12% 19 4% 176 7%
Zutphen 26 5% 15 4% 23 6% 16 4% 15 3% 21 4% 116 4%
Zwolle 24 5% 24 6% 13 3% 14 4% 24 5% 23 5% 122 5%
Total 501 100% 405 100% 383 100% 391 100% 448 100% 467 100% 2.595 100%
Source: Data from the Public Prosecution Service (reference date: January 2011)
10, 11
Table B4.7 Nature of the registered cases (2005-2010)
Non-aggra-
240b paravated
child
pornography
graph 1
240b paragraph
2
240b in
conjunction
with 248
paragraph 1
Aggravated
child pornography
11
240b in
conjunction
with 248
paragraph 2
240b in
conjunction
with 248
paragraph 3
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Total
N % N % N % N % N % N % N %
462 92% 388 10 96% 349 91% 355 91% 395 88% 421 90% 2.370 91%
39 8% 17 4% 34 9% 36 9% 53 12% 42 9% 221 9%
- - - - - - - - - - 3 1% 3 0%
- - - - - - - - - - 1 0% 1 0%
- - - - - - - - - - - - - -
240b in
conjunction
with 248
paragraph 4
Sub-total
- - - - - - - - - - - - - -
(aggravated
child pornography)
39 8% 17 4% 34 9% 36 9% 53 12% 46 10% 225 9%
Total 501 100% 405 100% 383 100% 391 100% 448 100% 467 100% 2.595 100%
Source: Data from the Public Prosecution Service (reference date: January 2011)
10 In one instance, it is unclear whether it was a case of non-aggravated or aggravated child pornography,
because no paragraph number was recorded. The decision has been taken to categorise this case as
non-aggravated child pornography.
11 In the case of Article 248 of the Dutch Criminal Code, it has been examined whether or not this Article –
which brings with it an increased penalty – has occurred in the same offence exclusively with Article
240b paragraph 1 and/or paragraph 2 of the Dutch Criminal Code.