02.09.2013 Views

Child Pornography - Home | National Rapporteur on Trafficking in ...

Child Pornography - Home | National Rapporteur on Trafficking in ...

Child Pornography - Home | National Rapporteur on Trafficking in ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

38<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>Child</str<strong>on</strong>g> PornograPhy First report oF the Dutch NatioNal rapporteur<br />

and <strong>in</strong>ternati<strong>on</strong>al network of amateur producers and distributors rema<strong>in</strong>ed: a ‘sophisticated global<br />

cottage <strong>in</strong>dustry’ 37 emerged, <strong>in</strong> which <strong>in</strong>dividuals from the amateur circuit made use of new forms of<br />

technology <strong>in</strong> order to produce and distribute material themselves, and due to <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g globalisati<strong>on</strong><br />

also travelled to meet other perpetrators and victims. This, <strong>in</strong> turn, c<strong>on</strong>t<strong>in</strong>ued to fuel traffick<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> human<br />

be<strong>in</strong>gs, child sex tourism, child prostituti<strong>on</strong> and abuse even further. 38<br />

Research <strong>in</strong>to the nature and extent of child abuse material from this period is largely absent and<br />

c<strong>on</strong>sequently there is little <strong>in</strong>sight <strong>in</strong>to the producti<strong>on</strong> of material <strong>in</strong> the Netherlands. 39 However,<br />

the fact that it was no l<strong>on</strong>ger visible to the wider public did not mean that the phenomen<strong>on</strong> had<br />

disappeared from the Netherlands. The material found am<strong>on</strong>gst the aforementi<strong>on</strong>ed material that<br />

was seized <strong>in</strong> Amsterdam was primarily old, and had been produced <strong>in</strong> other countries. 40 It was also<br />

said that a ‘substantial’ part of this material appeared to have come from the Netherlands itself. The<br />

material that was seized (still) c<strong>on</strong>sisted, at that time, of photographs, video record<strong>in</strong>gs and 8 mm<br />

film copied <strong>on</strong>to video format. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to the <str<strong>on</strong>g>Child</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Pornography</str<strong>on</strong>g> and <str<strong>on</strong>g>Child</str<strong>on</strong>g> Prostituti<strong>on</strong> Work<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Group, care organisati<strong>on</strong>s were not alert to the potential victimisati<strong>on</strong> element of child pornography,<br />

which meant that there were no records of this either. 41 The period also heralded an age <strong>in</strong> which the<br />

producti<strong>on</strong>, distributi<strong>on</strong> and possessi<strong>on</strong> of child abuse images and films became visible <strong>on</strong>ce aga<strong>in</strong>.<br />

In 1992, the <strong>in</strong>vestigative journalist Tate cited the case of a woman that had been a victim of child pornography<br />

at the end of the 1950s: “Paedophiles […] will always f<strong>in</strong>d new ways to obta<strong>in</strong>, abuse and manipulate<br />

children. They are always look<strong>in</strong>g for new victims and new methods of gett<strong>in</strong>g them”. Tate already anticipated <strong>in</strong><br />

37 O’D<strong>on</strong>nell & Milner (2007, p.20) wrote: “as a result of expand<strong>in</strong>g access to these <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly <strong>in</strong>expensive technologies,<br />

child pornography quickly mutated <strong>in</strong>to a ‘sophisticated global cottage <strong>in</strong>dustry […] where material was produced <strong>in</strong><br />

domestic sett<strong>in</strong>gs and exchanged or bartered for pers<strong>on</strong>al rather than profit motives”.<br />

38 O’D<strong>on</strong>nell & Milner, 2007, p.21. For example, travel guides were published with names such as<br />

‘Mankoff’s Lusty Europe’ and ‘Where the Young Ones Are’, which described where child prostitutes<br />

could be found. Part of the <strong>in</strong>ternati<strong>on</strong>al amateur network existed <strong>in</strong> the Netherlands. Tate (1990,<br />

p.140) dubbed this the ‘Dutch c<strong>on</strong>necti<strong>on</strong>’ and claimed that (wanted) sex offenders moved to the Netherlands,<br />

which they regarded as a safe haven. That was certa<strong>in</strong>ly the case with the ‘Björn tapes’, beh<strong>in</strong>d<br />

which lay a British-Dutch paedophile network. In this case, material was produced and distributed <strong>in</strong><br />

the Netherlands and the purchasers of the tapes were spread across the whole of Europe. A Paedophile<br />

R<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> Amsterdam, The Guardian, March 1997, available at: www.nickdavies.net/1997/03/01/a-paedophile-r<strong>in</strong>g-<strong>in</strong>-amsterdam/<br />

(viewed 30 August 2011).<br />

39 <str<strong>on</strong>g>Child</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Pornography</str<strong>on</strong>g> and <str<strong>on</strong>g>Child</str<strong>on</strong>g> Prostituti<strong>on</strong> <strong>in</strong> the Netherlands Work<strong>in</strong>g Group, 1998, p.28. Material<br />

was no l<strong>on</strong>ger compiled and openly offered for sale. It was no l<strong>on</strong>ger possible to obta<strong>in</strong> figures of the<br />

victims from child pornography magaz<strong>in</strong>es, as had been d<strong>on</strong>e <strong>in</strong> research <strong>in</strong>to child abuse material<br />

from the 1970s and the early 1980s (see for example Rossen & Schuijer, 1992).<br />

40 The study c<strong>on</strong>cerned an <strong>in</strong>ventory drawn up by the Amsterdam/Amstelland regi<strong>on</strong>al police <strong>on</strong> the basis<br />

of <strong>in</strong>vestigati<strong>on</strong>s <strong>in</strong> the period ’94-’96 and may shed some light <strong>on</strong> the material that was <strong>in</strong> circulati<strong>on</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong> the period 1985-1994. For example, the study did not menti<strong>on</strong> computer files c<strong>on</strong>ta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g child abuse<br />

material (<str<strong>on</strong>g>Child</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Pornography</str<strong>on</strong>g> and <str<strong>on</strong>g>Child</str<strong>on</strong>g> Prostituti<strong>on</strong> Work<strong>in</strong>g Group <strong>in</strong> the Netherlands, 1998, pp.29-<br />

30). The work<strong>in</strong>g group also noted that it is difficult to dist<strong>in</strong>guish between new and old material, and<br />

material produced <strong>in</strong> the Netherlands and that produced <strong>in</strong> other countries.<br />

41 <str<strong>on</strong>g>Child</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Pornography</str<strong>on</strong>g> and <str<strong>on</strong>g>Child</str<strong>on</strong>g> Prostituti<strong>on</strong> Work<strong>in</strong>g Group <strong>in</strong> the Netherlands, 1998, p.28.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!