07.03.2014 Views

economics of on-farm development - Institute for Social and ...

economics of on-farm development - Institute for Social and ...

economics of on-farm development - Institute for Social and ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The characteristics <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the sample holdings in terms <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the l<strong>and</strong> use being<br />

followed across the three locati<strong>on</strong>s are furnished in tables 4.5 <strong>and</strong> 4.6. From the<br />

table 4.5. it is apparent that in the Kallada project. the effective area under paddy<br />

is less than 50 per cent. which shows that most <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the <strong>farm</strong>ers have c<strong>on</strong>verted<br />

their paddy fields <strong>for</strong> other uses. The proporti<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> rubber area is 56 per cent <strong>and</strong><br />

the highest percentage is found in the head reaches at 59 per cent compared to 56<br />

per cent in the tail reaches <strong>and</strong> 52 per cent in the middle. The average size <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

paddy holding is 0.45 acres across the three locati<strong>on</strong>s.<br />

Table 4.5: Characteristics <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Sample <strong>farm</strong> households in Kallada project<br />

Characteristics Head Middle Tail Total<br />

Total sample (No.) 78 65 57 200<br />

Wet area (acres) 56.92 41.38 32.85 131.15<br />

Drv area (acres) 108.13 130.6 91.67 330.4<br />

Total area (acres) 165.05 171.98 124.52 461.55<br />

Effective paddv area (%) 49.77 38.02 44.67 41.58<br />

Share <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> rubber area (%) 49.33 51.13 49.73 50.11<br />

Rubber area holders (%) 58.97 52.31 56.14 56.00<br />

Average holding size (acres) 2.12 2.65 2.18 2.31<br />

Average rubber area (acres) 1.77 2.59 1.94 2.07<br />

Average paddv area (acres) 0.44 0.45 0.43 0.45<br />

In the Peechi project. the area under paddy c<strong>on</strong>tinues to be almost 57 per<br />

cent <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the cropped area (Tahle 4.6). But in the head reaches. the area under<br />

paddy is 61 per cent. followed by 57 per cent in the middle reach <strong>and</strong> 46 per cent<br />

in the tail end. Rubber is gnlWn predominantly in the tail reaches where 63 per<br />

cent <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the <strong>farm</strong>ers in the tail end grow rubber. The proporti<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> paddy fields<br />

leased out <strong>for</strong> banana cultivati<strong>on</strong> is more in the tail reaches (38 %). followed by<br />

21 per cent in the middle: reaches. The c<strong>on</strong>versi<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> paddy area <strong>for</strong> other l<strong>and</strong><br />

uses is rdativdy high in the tail reaches at 25 per cent as against 22 per cent in<br />

the head <strong>and</strong> 20 per cent in the middle reaches.<br />

126

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!