07.03.2014 Views

economics of on-farm development - Institute for Social and ...

economics of on-farm development - Institute for Social and ...

economics of on-farm development - Institute for Social and ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

T a bl e 5 3 Ph . I d Ii . I<br />

- - vSlca an mancla per ormance <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>completedjlrojects, 1995-96<br />

Physical per<strong>for</strong>mance Fiscal per<strong>for</strong>mance<br />

Compl<br />

(Net area in hal<br />

Cost!<br />

(Rs. lakhs) eti<strong>on</strong><br />

Name <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the<br />

Achieve<br />

ha.<br />

Orig. Rev. Cost<br />

time<br />

project Target (%) (Iakhs)<br />

ment est. est. esc. (%) (years)<br />

Chalakudy 26680 18530 69 188 188 0.2 0.11 9<br />

Peechi 17555 15262 87 235 235 0.0 0.15 12<br />

Malampuzha 29463 19802 67 388 580 50.0 0.29 17<br />

Neyyar 16042 8300 52 248 461 86.0 0.55 22<br />

Pothundy 8792 4685 53 234 234 0.1 0.50 13<br />

Gavathri 7651 4880 64 220 220 0.0 0.45 14<br />

Walayar 4536 3752 83 92 1'1 J_ 43.1 0.35 II<br />

Vazhani 3565 2113 59 100 100 0.0 0.47 11<br />

Mangalam 4816 3313 69 45 106 135.6 0.32 13<br />

Cheerakuzhi 2268 9-' )- 42 91 91 0.0 0.96 16<br />

Pampa 21135 20710 98 348 6340 1555.6 3.06 29<br />

Perfyar Valley 32800 30567 93 383 6300 l7l1.5 2.06 37<br />

Chitturpuzha 15700 16102 103 106 2080 1862.3 1.29 32<br />

Kuttiadi 14570 14111 97 496 55000 1008.9 3.89 31<br />

Gr<strong>and</strong> total 205573 163079 79 3174 22567 611.0 1.39 19.08<br />

Source: Government <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Kerala. Ec<strong>on</strong>omic ReVIew. variOus years.<br />

The per<strong>for</strong>mance <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong>-going schemes has been far from satisfactory (table 5.4) as<br />

the rate <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> achievement was <strong>on</strong>ly 22 per cent resulting in a cost escalati<strong>on</strong> to the<br />

extent <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 16:;3 per ccnt. Irrigated area expansiun had taken place <strong>on</strong>ly in the casc <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

four schemes. the lowest being in the Kallada scheme (49.35 %). In the rest <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the<br />

schemes. no achie\ement had taken place eyen after 20 years with costs rising above<br />

50Cio per cent in the case <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> two schemes <strong>and</strong> above 2400 per cent in 5 cases. The<br />

cumulativc cost <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> infrastructun: <strong>development</strong> is more than rupees <strong>on</strong>e lakh in 9 <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

the 15 schemes. It is important to note that this expenditure became unproductive in<br />

the absence <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> any commensurate additi<strong>on</strong> to irrigated area. The time-lag appears to<br />

he enormous in the <strong>on</strong>-going schemes. It is almost Jlluhk to that <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the compkkd<br />

schemes. with an average lag <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 23.6 years. Menti<strong>on</strong> must be made <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> two schemt:s.<br />

142

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!