07.03.2014 Views

economics of on-farm development - Institute for Social and ...

economics of on-farm development - Institute for Social and ...

economics of on-farm development - Institute for Social and ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

project. where it is very high at Rs. 5125 per acre. For instance, the coefficient <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

variati<strong>on</strong> (CV) <strong>for</strong> cost <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> cultivati<strong>on</strong> is <strong>on</strong>ly 19, as against 26.6 per cent, 22.3 per<br />

cent <strong>and</strong> ~ I pc:r cent <strong>for</strong> yield gross income <strong>and</strong> net income respectively. The<br />

higher C\' in net income retlects the intensity <strong>and</strong> scale <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> input use by the<br />

<strong>farm</strong>ers across the projects. The applicati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> inputs depends up<strong>on</strong> <strong>farm</strong>ers'<br />

ability to mobilise <strong>on</strong> time <strong>and</strong> in the desired quantity. It is in this c<strong>on</strong>text that<br />

training to <strong>farm</strong>ers plays crucial educating them <strong>on</strong> various aspects <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>farm</strong>ing .<br />

. -\ brief discussi<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the impact <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> OFD <strong>on</strong> crop output in Peechi project,<br />

whIch is seb:ted <strong>for</strong> indepth study, is attempted in the following. The details are<br />

presented in table 6.12.<br />

Table 6.12: Impact <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> OFD <strong>on</strong> crop output in Peechi. benefit cost analysis<br />

<strong>for</strong> \985-86 to \99~-95<br />

Year<br />

Total expo <strong>on</strong> ,<br />

i<br />

Total earnings <strong>on</strong> Net return <strong>on</strong><br />

Benefit cost<br />

CAD schemes add l. crop output<br />

expenditure<br />

ratio<br />

(Rs Lakhs) (Rs. Lakhs) (%)<br />

1985·86 8.44 163 19.31 1931.28<br />

1986·87 18.91 244 12.90 1290.32<br />

1987·88 4.36 300 68.81 6880.73<br />

1988-89 63.85 222 3.48 347.69<br />

1989·90 222.25 212 0.95 95.39<br />

1990·91 190.77 138 0.72 72.34<br />

1991·92 164.46 162 0.99 98.50<br />

1992·93 199.65 65 0.33 32.56<br />

1993·94 169.23 ·123 ·0.73 ·72.68<br />

1994·95 135.87 386 2.84 284.10<br />

Total 1177. 79 1769 1.50 150.20<br />

Source: CADA. 1996<br />

The table shows that the implementati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> CAD programmes in Peechi<br />

. hi' t' \"h"r'> a tllUlti·fold increase in<br />

project pick

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!