economics of on-farm development - Institute for Social and ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

GOAP (1982): Report <strong>of</strong> the Commission for Irrigation Utilisation, Government <strong>of</strong> Andhra Pradesh. Hyderabad. GOI (1965): Evaluation <strong>of</strong> Major Irrigation Projects: Some Case Studies, Government <strong>of</strong> India, New Delhi. GOt (1965a): Criteria for Appraising the Feasihility <strong>of</strong> irrigation Projects, Research Programmes Committee. Government <strong>of</strong> India, Planning Commission, New Delhi. GOI (1970): Joint Indo American Team Report on Efficient Water Use and Farm Management Study in India, Government <strong>of</strong> India New Delhi (Mimeo). GOI (1972): Report <strong>of</strong> the Irrigation Commission, Vol. I, Government <strong>of</strong> India, Ministry <strong>of</strong> Irrigation and Power, New Delhi. GOI (1973a): Report <strong>of</strong> the Sixth Finance Commission, Government <strong>of</strong> India, Ministry <strong>of</strong> Finance, New Delhi. GOt (1973b): Report <strong>of</strong> the Expert Commiltee on Rise in Costs <strong>of</strong> Irrigation and Multi-purpose Projects, Government <strong>of</strong> India. Ministry <strong>of</strong> Irrigation and Power. New Delhi. GOI ( 1976a): Report <strong>of</strong> the National Commission on Agriculture. Government <strong>of</strong> India. Ministry <strong>of</strong> Agriculture and Irrigation. New Delhi. GOI (1976b): Slipplementary Report <strong>of</strong> the Comptroller and AlidilOr General <strong>of</strong> India/or the year 1975-76, Government <strong>of</strong>lndia, New Delhi. (iOI (1980a): Report <strong>of</strong> the WorkillK Group on Irrigation: Maior and Jfedillm Irrigation Programme, 1980-85, Government <strong>of</strong> India. Ministry <strong>of</strong> Irrigation and Power, New Delhi. GOI (1983): Planning Process and Monitoring Mechanism with Reference to Irrigation Projects, 141" Report <strong>of</strong> the Pliblic Accounts Committee (PAL), 1982-83, Seventh Lok Sabha, Government <strong>of</strong> India, Ministry <strong>of</strong> Planning (Planning Commission), Lok Sabha Secretariat, New Delhi. GOI (1989): Report <strong>of</strong> the Working Group on Major and Medium Irrigation Programme for the Eighth Plan, 1990-95, Government <strong>of</strong> India. New Delhi. (jOI (1992). Report <strong>of</strong> the Committee on Pricing <strong>of</strong> Irrigation Water, Government <strong>of</strong> India Planning Commission, New Delhi. GOI (1992): Eighth Five Year Plan- 1992-97, Vol. 1I Government <strong>of</strong> India, Planing Commission, New Delhi. GOI (2000): Economic Survey, 1999-2000. Government <strong>of</strong> India. Ministry <strong>of</strong> Finance, New Delhi. (i()K ( 1965): Report on the Consolidation <strong>of</strong> Holdings, Board <strong>of</strong> Revenue. (by T. N. layachandran). Government <strong>of</strong> Kerala, Trivandrum. GOK (1967a): Trivandrum. Kerala Land Utilisation Order, Government <strong>of</strong> Kerala, 376
GOK (1967b): Evaluation <strong>of</strong> Some Major Irrigation Projects in Kerala, Government <strong>of</strong> Kerala Bureau <strong>of</strong> Economics and Statistics (BES), Trivandrum. GOK (1974): Irrigation Projects <strong>of</strong>Kerala, Government <strong>of</strong> Kerala Public Works Department (PWD), Trivandrum. GOK (1977): Statistics for Planning. Bureau <strong>of</strong> Economics and Statistics, Government <strong>of</strong> Kerala Trivandrum. GOK (1979): Terminal Report <strong>of</strong> the Pilot Project for Soil and Water Management in the Neyyar Command Area, Government <strong>of</strong> Kerala, 1973- 77. GOK (1981): Terminal Report ol the Pilot Project for Soil and Water Wanagement in the Chalakudy Command Area. Government <strong>of</strong> Kerala, 1977-81. GOK (1983): Datahase ol Kerala Economy. Section III. Irrigation, Government <strong>of</strong> Kerala Department <strong>of</strong> Economics and Statistics, Trivandrum. GOK (1988): Economic Review. Government <strong>of</strong> Kerala. State Planning Board, Trivandrum. GOK (1990): .\finor Irrigation Works in Kerala. A Rn·iew. Government <strong>of</strong> Kerala. Public Works Department (irrigation). Trivandrum. GOK (1993). Statistics for Planning. Department <strong>of</strong> Economics and Statistics (DES). Government <strong>of</strong> Kerala. Trivandrum. GOK (1997a): Sinth Five Year Plan, 1997-2002: Report olthe Task Force on Field Crops, Government <strong>of</strong> Kerala State Planning Board, Thiruvananthapuram, June, 88p. GOK (1997b): Economic Review, Government <strong>of</strong> Kerala. State Planning Board, Thiruvananthapuram. GOK (1998a): Economic Review, Government <strong>of</strong> Kerala, State Planning Board, Thiruvananthapuram. GOK (1998b): Paddy Field Protection Movement Study Report, Popular Expert Committee, Government <strong>of</strong> Kerala, Thiruvananthapuram, 80p. (jOK (1999) Economic Rn·iell. G,l\t:rnment <strong>of</strong> Kerala. State Planning Board, Thiruvananthapuram. Mangalabhanu (1977): Project Report for Malampuzha. Peechi, Chalakudy Agriculture, Government <strong>of</strong> Kerala, the Command Area Development. Irrigation Projects, Dept. <strong>of</strong> Mathew. Minnie (1996): Report o/the Committee COllStituted for Suggesting Amendments /0 Kerala Lund C'tilisation Order (196 7 ). Government <strong>of</strong> Kerala, Trivandrum. NSSO (1984): Sarvekshana, 8 (2). National Sample Survey Organisation, New Delhi 377
Page 1 and 2:
, ECONOMICS OF ON-FARM DEVELOPMENT:
Page 3 and 4:
DEC LARA TION I declare that the th
Page 5 and 6:
I thank Dr. KM Varadan, CWRDM. Kozh
Page 7 and 8:
CONTENTS Chapter 1 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4
Page 9 and 10:
4.9 Occupational Status of<
Page 11 and 12:
5.3 5.4 5.6 5.7 Financial Investmen
Page 13 and 14:
Figures 6.1 6.2 Chart 6.1 Appendix
Page 15 and 16:
Abbreviations used ASMO BFA's CADA
Page 17 and 18:
An attempt has been made in this ch
Page 19 and 20:
among the people and the process <s
Page 21 and 22:
the Indian state had followed a pol
Page 23 and 24:
water harvesting 7 by arguing that
Page 25 and 26:
(World Register of
Page 27 and 28:
Eighth Plan has been estimated by t
Page 29 and 30:
One of the most im
Page 31 and 32:
integrated development of</
Page 33 and 34:
inadequate attention given to OFD w
Page 35 and 36:
performance of irr
Page 37 and 38:
created. According to the Central W
Page 39 and 40:
7 lagoons, 901 tanks and over 30 la
Page 41 and 42:
competent and responsible agency wi
Page 43 and 44:
physiographic conditions of
Page 45 and 46:
(14 completed and 15 ongoing) proje
Page 47 and 48:
interventions to improve the operat
Page 49 and 50:
a summary of findi
Page 51 and 52:
economic analysis of</stron
Page 53 and 54:
een brought out by many scholars in
Page 55 and 56:
While the economic benefits <strong
Page 57 and 58:
sources, wasteful utilisation <stro
Page 59 and 60:
such as rise in pnces, inadequate i
Page 61 and 62:
the completion of
Page 63 and 64:
of rainfed croppin
Page 65 and 66:
areas being 8 per cent (GO!, 1998).
Page 67 and 68:
investment In irrigation developmen
Page 69 and 70:
Subsequently, an Expert Committee w
Page 71 and 72:
highlighted the problems related to
Page 73 and 74:
2.3.1 Studies on tbe impact <strong
Page 75 and 76:
command area has reduced the labour
Page 77 and 78:
Nanjundappa (1988), while examining
Page 79 and 80:
y the CADA have led to low producti
Page 81 and 82:
agents as against 90 per cent or mo
Page 83 and 84:
among their members; c) insisting t
Page 85 and 86:
Ansari (1989) shows that there have
Page 87 and 88:
unit of land culti
Page 89 and 90:
subgroup increased from 40 per cent
Page 91 and 92:
1) The maIn activity being undertak
Page 93 and 94:
which are unique in several ways, t
Page 95 and 96:
across the states in different agro
Page 97 and 98:
and social setting In which a proje
Page 99 and 100:
The indepth study to examine the fa
Page 101 and 102:
\,;nar~ .NO. ~.~: .t"rocesses ana s
Page 103 and 104:
understand the problems related to
Page 105 and 106:
of the crop produc
Page 107 and 108:
greater differences between the the
Page 109 and 110:
Chart ~o J.2 'Vater Institutions an
Page 111 and 112:
specific promotional programmes und
Page 113 and 114:
Chart No. 3.3 Explaining failure <s
Page 115 and 116:
3.3.2 Crop specific promotional ins
Page 117 and 118:
non-viable paddy. Even the farmers
Page 119 and 120:
'- K01HIKOO --', , .-- :,' , \. ,.'
Page 121 and 122:
strictly adhered to the directions
Page 123 and 124:
4.1.2 Financial aspects The total e
Page 125 and 126:
4.2 The Kallada Irrigation and Tree
Page 127 and 128:
Map 4.4: Kallada Ayacut , IItIJrt ~
Page 129 and 130:
in lands having slopes less than 3
Page 131 and 132:
Table 4.1. Envisa~ed Croppin~ Patte
Page 133 and 134:
in terms of underg
Page 135 and 136:
meters. The end of
Page 137 and 138:
and Kayamkulam branch in Phase II.
Page 139 and 140:
lands. The average holding size is
Page 141 and 142:
The characteristics of</str
Page 143 and 144:
size group is the highest in the mi
Page 145 and 146:
Table 4.10: Occupational status <st
Page 147 and 148:
Appendix 4.1: Physical and technica
Page 149 and 150:
Chapter 5 Dynamics of</stro
Page 151 and 152:
plan. annual plans (1966-69) and th
Page 153 and 154:
gt:ographical concentration <strong
Page 155 and 156:
Concerted efforts were also made fo
Page 157 and 158:
T a bl e 5 3 Ph . I d Ii . I - - vS
Page 159 and 160:
expenditure and p~ysical achievemen
Page 161 and 162:
the state cannot be treated as a pu
Page 163 and 164:
in gross irrigated area. While cana
Page 165 and 166:
development of lan
Page 167 and 168:
The annual compound growth rates in
Page 169 and 170:
5.2.1 Dynamics of
Page 171 and 172:
area and yield of
Page 173 and 174:
A micro level study by Narayanan (1
Page 175 and 176:
ubber cultivation. in Kallada. the
Page 177 and 178:
The debate on conversion of
Page 179 and 180:
(Table 5.10). The table indicates t
Page 181 and 182:
eqUires substantial investment for
Page 183 and 184:
Source: Govt. of K
Page 185 and 186:
the period 1985-86 to 1997-98. For
Page 187 and 188:
The overall scenario suggests that
Page 189 and 190:
project, they tend to undertake yie
Page 191 and 192:
the establishment expenditure (stri
Page 193 and 194:
a CriSIS. As the works involved In
Page 195 and 196:
(ii) In the Karapuzha project. the
Page 197 and 198:
5.15). The table indicates that the
Page 199 and 200:
place. There were three revisions J
Page 201 and 202:
Revenue vis Capital expenditure The
Page 203 and 204:
Let us now examIne the intensity <s
Page 205 and 206:
Cost escalation due to arbitration
Page 207 and 208:
Another source of
Page 209 and 210:
process would be very high. This al
Page 211 and 212:
construction for more than 20 years
Page 213 and 214:
are mainly concentrated in Thrissur
Page 215 and 216:
ApMndlJ ~.1: ProjKI-wlw Ihne tn Tot
Page 217 and 218:
ArlPcndil: ~.J: "'inanchtllnnstmrnl
Page 219 and 220:
Chapter 6 Economics of</str
Page 221 and 222:
conditions of the
Page 223 and 224:
Chart: 6.1 Organisational Chart sho
Page 225 and 226:
and Palakkad together occupy 10 <st
Page 227 and 228:
Table 6.2. Physical and financial t
Page 229 and 230:
the total allocation has been for t
Page 231 and 232:
per cent achievement in physical te
Page 233 and 234:
Besides. it has been reported that
Page 235 and 236:
I , MalamDuzha 387 7.39 1908.53 13.
Page 237 and 238:
~~- ~- --~ In all others. the BC ra
Page 239 and 240:
possible in these lands during Khar
Page 241 and 242:
Hence. it may be argued that since
Page 243 and 244:
It is mainly due to scarcity <stron
Page 245 and 246:
project. where it is very high at R
Page 247 and 248:
proper coordination between variOUS
Page 249 and 250:
deficiencies that help drawing less
Page 251 and 252:
conjunctive use of
Page 253 and 254:
3) Again. due to the high density <
Page 255 and 256:
Table 6.13: Details of</str
Page 257 and 258:
doubts about the senousness <strong
Page 259 and 260:
practice IS more conspIcuous In the
Page 261 and 262:
2.05 HP as compared to 1.68 HP in t
Page 263 and 264:
large holders have spent two to thr
Page 265 and 266:
Farming is considered mostly as a s
Page 267 and 268:
The profitability
Page 269 and 270:
noticed in the case of</str
Page 271 and 272:
The Cobb-Douglas (CD) Function has
Page 273 and 274:
· 13 Bank assistance programme and
Page 275 and 276:
etween I to 2 ha. are to arrange fo
Page 277 and 278:
Table 6.22: Status of</stro
Page 279 and 280:
Though almost all the farmers repor
Page 281 and 282:
3854 in the middle reaches. The pro
Page 283 and 284:
The net income from vegetables and
Page 285 and 286:
Appendix 6.1: Project-Wise Physical
Page 287 and 288:
Chapter 7 On-Farm Development: Dete
Page 289 and 290:
It can be seen from the survey data
Page 291 and 292:
een made to examme as to how many f
Page 293 and 294:
a farmer to use water from the dist
Page 295 and 296:
The farmers were asked to reflect u
Page 297 and 298:
evamping needed to reorient the MCS
Page 299 and 300:
supplies. What is more interesting
Page 301 and 302:
the knowledge of i
Page 303 and 304:
All of the five ex
Page 305 and 306:
It is evident from the table that t
Page 307 and 308:
implications on the dynamics <stron
Page 309 and 310:
competitive monocropl2 as no other
Page 311 and 312:
of conversion thro
Page 313 and 314:
involving farmers as active members
Page 315 and 316:
The viability of p
Page 317 and 318:
factors l8 . As a result. the agric
Page 319 and 320:
The rise in price of</stron
Page 321 and 322:
may be observed that the canal seep
Page 323 and 324:
process of paddy l
Page 325 and 326:
Table 7.19: Productivity and gross
Page 327 and 328:
The technical constraints In the de
Page 329 and 330:
2) Lack of irrigat
Page 331 and 332:
manure or fertilisers are also do n
Page 333 and 334:
according to the conventional basin
Page 335 and 336:
Registration Act, 1860 in the erstw
Page 337 and 338:
The pattern of act
Page 339 and 340:
eported by CADA of
Page 341 and 342:
Appendix 7.2: Paddy land conversion
Page 343 and 344: d,l!llS in the post-independence pc
Page 345 and 346: all(lcatioll ill the absence <stron
Page 347 and 348: irrigation commands. Th;; stud) was
Page 349 and 350: comparative COSI .:conomlcs <strong
Page 351 and 352: time lag involved in completion uf
Page 353 and 354: the state has increased by about 46
Page 355 and 356: cultivation of com
Page 357 and 358: through the effective implementatiC
Page 359 and 360: een the highest in Kallada project
Page 361 and 362: It was noticed that among the vario
Page 363 and 364: The institutional paradigm evolved
Page 365 and 366: of India to be rel
Page 367 and 368: economically viable. This underscor
Page 369 and 370: The intensity and spread of
Page 371 and 372: of allocation and
Page 373 and 374: shows that filed realities have not
Page 375 and 376: as water management related factors
Page 377 and 378: labour intensive farming operations
Page 379 and 380: Given the dynamics, problems and co
Page 381 and 382: ground realities associated with cr
Page 383 and 384: Dhawan, B.D. (1989): Sludies in Irr
Page 385 and 386: Kothari, Rajni, (1989): Politics an
Page 387 and 388: Vaidyanathan, A (1999): Water Resou
Page 389 and 390: Ghosh, Prabir De, Budhadeb (1998):
Page 391 and 392: Nair, Sukumaran, M.K. (1999): 'Rura
Page 393: Varadan, K,~ (1999): 'Estimation <s
Page 397 and 398: Ferrer. A.M., .L.e. Lucero (1988):
Page 399 and 400: Suresh, K.A. (2000): 'Group Managem
Page 401 and 402: Tomlinson, B.R. (1992): 'The Indian
show all

economics of on-farm development - Institute for Social and ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?