10.12.2012 Views

The Individual, Auto/biography and History in South Africa

The Individual, Auto/biography and History in South Africa

The Individual, Auto/biography and History in South Africa

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

entextualised <strong>in</strong> diverse ways”, creat<strong>in</strong>g a context that would facilitate or even h<strong>in</strong>der<br />

“later extraction, rearrangement, <strong>and</strong> re‐presentation”. 39<br />

Here we have an approach, which moves beyond a framework of seamlessness <strong>and</strong><br />

authentic voice, dem<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g an exam<strong>in</strong>ation of the “character of life history/story as<br />

verbal communication”, <strong>and</strong> an approach to lives as “method, testimony <strong>and</strong> creative<br />

process”. 40 For Kratz, the entire “structure of the overall exchange” should be reflected<br />

on <strong>in</strong> order to underst<strong>and</strong> “what any life history/story is <strong>and</strong> how it came to be told as it<br />

was”. 41 Reflexive possibilities along l<strong>in</strong>es as suggested by Kratz have begun to emerge<br />

from with<strong>in</strong> the discipl<strong>in</strong>e of anthropology, as an outgrowth of earlier <strong>in</strong>tonations of a<br />

concern for reflexivity <strong>and</strong> textual attention to ethnographic production.<br />

Such theoretical attention to lives <strong>and</strong> their production has rarely been achieved with<strong>in</strong><br />

the discipl<strong>in</strong>ary boundaries of history. One of the supposedly great issues of<br />

historiography concerns the problem of the <strong>in</strong>dividual <strong>in</strong> history <strong>and</strong> the place of the<br />

<strong>in</strong>dividual, <strong>and</strong> even ‘the great man’, <strong>in</strong> historical explanation. It is this question that has<br />

<strong>in</strong>fluenced the place of <strong>biography</strong> <strong>in</strong> the discipl<strong>in</strong>e of history. As E.H. Carr framed the<br />

problem <strong>in</strong> his endur<strong>in</strong>gly famous 1961 Cambridge lectures: what has been “the weight<br />

of the <strong>in</strong>dividual <strong>and</strong> social elements on both sides of the equation?” 42 And related to<br />

this: “Is the object of the historian’s <strong>in</strong>quiry the behaviour of <strong>in</strong>dividuals or the action of<br />

social forces?” 43<br />

Carr has surveyed the “long pedigree” of the view that it is the “character <strong>and</strong><br />

behaviour of <strong>in</strong>dividuals” that matters <strong>in</strong> history rather than “vast impersonal forces”,<br />

<strong>and</strong> that “history is the <strong>biography</strong> of great men”. This genealogy is traced back to the<br />

ancient Greeks who attributed responsibility for the achievements of the past to the<br />

39 Cor<strong>in</strong>ne Kratz, ‘Conversations <strong>and</strong> Lives’, pp 136‐138.<br />

40 Cor<strong>in</strong>ne Kratz, ‘Conversations <strong>and</strong> Lives’, pp 129‐130.<br />

41 Cor<strong>in</strong>ne Kratz, ‘Conversations <strong>and</strong> Lives’ (revised draft), quoted from passages erroneously omitted<br />

from the published version on p138, paragraph 2.<br />

42Edward Hallett Carr, What is <strong>History</strong>? (Harmondsworth: Pengu<strong>in</strong> Books, 1985), p 35.<br />

43 Edward Hallett Carr, What is <strong>History</strong>?, p 44.<br />

22

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!