10.12.2012 Views

The Individual, Auto/biography and History in South Africa

The Individual, Auto/biography and History in South Africa

The Individual, Auto/biography and History in South Africa

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

[w]e need to attend to the historical processes that, through<br />

discourse, position subjects <strong>and</strong> produce their experiences. It is not<br />

<strong>in</strong>dividuals who have experience, but subjects who are constituted<br />

through experience. Experience <strong>in</strong> this def<strong>in</strong>ition then becomes not<br />

the orig<strong>in</strong> of our explanation, not the authoritative ... evidence that<br />

grounds what is known, but rather that which we seek to expla<strong>in</strong>,<br />

that about which knowledge is produced. To th<strong>in</strong>k about experience<br />

<strong>in</strong> this way is to historicise it as well as to historicise the identities it<br />

produces. 92<br />

See<strong>in</strong>g experience through the methods of social history led its practitioners to see the<br />

<strong>in</strong>dividual as a transparent category, rather than ask how conceptions of selves ‐ subjects<br />

<strong>and</strong> identities ‐ were produced. Instead, subjects were produced through the imposition<br />

of universal, naturalised categories, (the worker, the peasant, the black). <strong>The</strong> very<br />

processes of subject construction were precluded, with subject positions constructed as<br />

“ready made unities with firm, all‐encompass<strong>in</strong>g identities”. Questions of cognition,<br />

discourse, the production of knowledge, <strong>and</strong> the relevance of the position of subjects to<br />

the knowledge they produced were avoided. 93<br />

Follow<strong>in</strong>g Joan Scott, the processes by which subject positions are assigned, “the<br />

complex <strong>and</strong> chang<strong>in</strong>g discursive processes by which identities are ascribed, resisted, or<br />

embraced” are <strong>in</strong> need of explanation. To argue that the formation of new identities is a<br />

discursive phenomenon <strong>and</strong> that subjects are constituted discursively is to <strong>in</strong>sist that<br />

‘experience’ <strong>and</strong> language are connected. 94 Experience is neither straightforward, nor<br />

self‐evident. In redef<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g its operations beyond its usage <strong>in</strong> social history as the orig<strong>in</strong><br />

of explanation, is to <strong>in</strong>sist that it is always contested, <strong>and</strong> always political. For Joan Scott,<br />

the focus needs to be on the processes of identity formation, with an <strong>in</strong>sistence on the<br />

92 Joan Scott, ‘<strong>The</strong> Evidence of Experience’, pp 369‐370.<br />

93 Joan Scott, ‘<strong>The</strong> Evidence of Experience’, pp 373, 382; Gary M<strong>in</strong>kley, Ciraj Rassool <strong>and</strong> Leslie Witz,<br />

‘Thresholds, Gateways <strong>and</strong> Spectacles: Journey<strong>in</strong>g through <strong>South</strong> <strong>Africa</strong>n Hidden Pasts <strong>and</strong> Histories <strong>in</strong><br />

the Last Decade of the Twentieth Century’, Paper presented to the Conference on <strong>The</strong> Future of the Past:<br />

<strong>The</strong> Production of <strong>History</strong> <strong>in</strong> a Chang<strong>in</strong>g <strong>South</strong> <strong>Africa</strong>, 10‐12 July 1996, pp 4‐5.<br />

94 Joan Scott, ‘<strong>The</strong> Evidence of Experience’, pp 382‐383.<br />

36

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!