10.12.2012 Views

The Individual, Auto/biography and History in South Africa

The Individual, Auto/biography and History in South Africa

The Individual, Auto/biography and History in South Africa

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

story, creat<strong>in</strong>g a ‘transferential’ relationship to the biographical subject. <strong>The</strong> biographer,<br />

here, had autobiographical self‐awareness, <strong>and</strong> awareness of the complexity of the self. 80<br />

This work, especially that by Virg<strong>in</strong>ia Woolf (daughter of Leslie Stephen) <strong>and</strong> Lytton<br />

Strachey, who published Em<strong>in</strong>ent Victorians <strong>in</strong> 1918, radically disrupted the concept of a<br />

life‐course, <strong>and</strong> began to question the very pr<strong>in</strong>ciples of biographical identity <strong>and</strong><br />

biological unity fostered by their Victorian predecessors. <strong>The</strong>y emphasised the aesthetic<br />

dimensions of <strong>biography</strong>, with the biographer seen as artist, not chronicler. In their<br />

critique, both satirised the extent to which biographers, as “historians of life, dwell on<br />

the death‐bed scene”, posed a paradoxical connection between <strong>biography</strong> <strong>and</strong> death. 81<br />

<strong>The</strong>y po<strong>in</strong>ted to the tension between posthumous memorialisation <strong>and</strong> the attempt to<br />

‘grasp’ the life as lived, expressed <strong>in</strong> a language of monuments, statuary <strong>and</strong> epitaphs.<br />

Here, the biographic <strong>and</strong> the funereal were <strong>in</strong>termeshed, with the biographical subject<br />

identical to the dead.<br />

Exponents of this ‘new <strong>biography</strong>’ saw the role of the biographer as expos<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong><br />

reveal<strong>in</strong>g the ‘real self’ of the subject, with no disguises. Strachey <strong>and</strong> Woolf questioned<br />

the categories of ‘<strong>in</strong>ner’ <strong>and</strong> ‘outer’ <strong>in</strong> relation to the subject <strong>and</strong> opened up dom<strong>in</strong>ant<br />

metaphors <strong>in</strong> biographical criticism, which dealt with some of the key issues of<br />

biographical representation: the relation between biographer <strong>and</strong> subject, the place of<br />

the body <strong>in</strong> <strong>biography</strong> <strong>and</strong> “the temporality of the life as lived <strong>and</strong> narrated”. 82<br />

Traditional <strong>biography</strong>, with its Cartesian foundations, had posited the category of the<br />

‘<strong>in</strong>dividual’, which presumed that humans were free <strong>in</strong>tellectual agents whose th<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g<br />

processes were not coerced by cultural or historical circumstances. We were offered “a<br />

narrator who imag<strong>in</strong>es that he speaks without simultaneously be<strong>in</strong>g spoken”. 83 <strong>The</strong><br />

‘new biographers’ of the early twentieth century, on the other h<strong>and</strong>, began to open up<br />

80 Laura Marcus, <strong>Auto</strong>/biographical Discourses, p 90.<br />

81Laura Marcus, <strong>Auto</strong>/biographical Discourses, p 93. See especially the essay by Virg<strong>in</strong>ia Woolf, ‘<strong>The</strong> New<br />

Biographyʹ, <strong>in</strong> Collected Essays, 4 vols, London: Hogarth, 1966/7, vol 4.<br />

82Laura Marcus, <strong>Auto</strong>/biographical Discourses, pp 130‐131.<br />

83Madan Sarup, An Introductory Guide to Post‐structuralism <strong>and</strong> Postmodernism, New York: Harvester<br />

Wheatsheaf, 1988, p 1.<br />

32

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!