10.12.2012 Views

The Individual, Auto/biography and History in South Africa

The Individual, Auto/biography and History in South Africa

The Individual, Auto/biography and History in South Africa

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

“Postwars of the dead” <strong>in</strong> Zimbabwe after <strong>in</strong>dependence <strong>in</strong> 1980 took the form of an<br />

elaborate variation on the memorial complex, which <strong>in</strong>volved the selective <strong>and</strong><br />

hierarchical creation of national heroes from the ranks of the leaders of freedom fighters.<br />

<strong>The</strong> modern memorial complex’s orig<strong>in</strong>s lay partly <strong>in</strong> the political, material <strong>and</strong> artistic<br />

resources that went <strong>in</strong>to the creation of national cenotaphs, mass military cemeteries <strong>and</strong><br />

tombs of the Unknown Soldier <strong>in</strong> Europe after World War I. This “unprecedented …<br />

l<strong>and</strong>scape of remembered personal identity”, which memorialised common soldiers,<br />

dead <strong>and</strong> miss<strong>in</strong>g, had ironically been marked by “self‐conscious <strong>and</strong> sacralised<br />

oblivion”, <strong>in</strong> which the “presence of an absence” had been recognised. This memorial<br />

character stood <strong>in</strong> sharp contrast to the triumphal monuments of the n<strong>in</strong>eteenth century,<br />

which had commemorated heroes of war, statesmanship, <strong>and</strong> colonial ‘exploration’.<br />

Richard Werbner has argued that <strong>in</strong> Zimbabwe after <strong>in</strong>dependence, the modern<br />

memorial complex was given a “dist<strong>in</strong>ctive”, perverse postcolonial form, which<br />

glorified “above all the <strong>in</strong>dividuality of great heroes of the nation”. 71<br />

Heroes Acre, which was constructed as a national shr<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong> Harare around a cemetery<br />

for the elite, <strong>and</strong> which served to memorialise “elite dist<strong>in</strong>ction” at the expense of<br />

ord<strong>in</strong>ary guerrillas, constituted a bizarre conflation of cenotaph <strong>and</strong> tomb of the<br />

unknown soldier. Heroes Acre stood at the apex of an elaborate system of state<br />

memorialism, which manufactured <strong>and</strong> graded an order of heroes from the national to<br />

the prov<strong>in</strong>cial to the local, with each buried <strong>in</strong> “an appropriate place with<strong>in</strong> [this]<br />

graded order of heroes acres”. At Heroes Acre <strong>in</strong> Harare, the ranks of chosen national<br />

heroes lay <strong>in</strong> luxury coff<strong>in</strong>s after state‐f<strong>in</strong>anced funerals, whereas the masses at the<br />

bottom of the hierarchy were expected to bury their own dead. In the rural areas, local<br />

heroes acres lay neglected, spark<strong>in</strong>g “<strong>in</strong>difference <strong>in</strong> the countryside towards<br />

71 Richard Werbner, ‘Smoke from the Barrel of a Gun: Postwars of the Dead, Memory <strong>and</strong><br />

Re<strong>in</strong>scription <strong>in</strong> Zimbabwe’, <strong>in</strong> Richard Werbner (ed), Memory <strong>and</strong> the Postcolony: <strong>Africa</strong>n<br />

Anthropology <strong>and</strong> the Critique of Power (London: Zed Books, 1998), pp 71‐73; see also Norma Kriger,<br />

‘<strong>The</strong> Politics of Creat<strong>in</strong>g National Heroes’, <strong>in</strong> Ngwabi Bhebe <strong>and</strong> Terence Ranger (eds), Soldiers <strong>in</strong><br />

Zimbabwe’s Liberation War (London: James Currey, 1995); on ‘sacralised oblivion’ <strong>and</strong> the orig<strong>in</strong>s of<br />

the modern memorial complex, see Thomas W Laqueur, ‘Memory <strong>and</strong> Nam<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the Great War’,<br />

<strong>in</strong> John R Gillis (ed), Commemorations: <strong>The</strong> Politics of National Identity. This ‘perverse’ memorialism<br />

can also be seen as anachronistic <strong>in</strong> its 19 th century heroic approach.<br />

75

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!