29.01.2013 Views

University of Vaasa - Vaasan yliopisto

University of Vaasa - Vaasan yliopisto

University of Vaasa - Vaasan yliopisto

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Conclusions<br />

In the first stage <strong>of</strong> this research, starting from a literature review, some variables<br />

were identified for evaluating both the strategic relevance attributed by companies to<br />

CSR, and the extent to which the CSR management process is formalised. The<br />

variables selected as indicators <strong>of</strong> strategic relevance were: integration <strong>of</strong> social<br />

aspects into the company's vision and mission; definition <strong>of</strong> specific, quantitative<br />

objectives for CSR that are incorporated into management reward systems; centrality<br />

<strong>of</strong> CSR initiatives with respect to the core business; level <strong>of</strong> stakeholder involvement;<br />

and establishment <strong>of</strong> strategic partnerships with NGOs or other social actors for the<br />

collaborative implementation <strong>of</strong> CSR programs. The variables chosen as indicators<br />

<strong>of</strong> the degree <strong>of</strong> formalisation <strong>of</strong> CSR were: existence <strong>of</strong> a CSR department or <strong>of</strong> a<br />

formal role dedicated to CSR management; implementation <strong>of</strong> standard management<br />

systems for different areas <strong>of</strong> the CSR agenda, or the formalisation <strong>of</strong> a customised<br />

managerial process; adoption <strong>of</strong> a CSR performance measurement system; and the<br />

production <strong>of</strong> formal documents for CSR reporting.<br />

By evaluating the above-described variables for the companies in our sample, we<br />

were able to identify different approaches to CSR depending on whether the strategic<br />

value <strong>of</strong> CSR or the more formal aspects <strong>of</strong> its managerial process tended to prevail.<br />

In particular, three approaches were found that merit special attention:<br />

• Formal CSR: in these companies, the prevailing aspect is the implementation<br />

<strong>of</strong> a formal management process devoted to CSR.<br />

• Social values-driven CSR: in this case, the strategic relevance <strong>of</strong> CSR<br />

prevails over the implementation <strong>of</strong> a formal management process.<br />

• Strategic CSR: these companies have implemented a formal management<br />

process for CSR, supported by a dedicated department, but also integrated<br />

CSR into its strategy, treating it as a source <strong>of</strong> value creation for both the<br />

business and its stakeholders.<br />

The empirical case studies were used to provide examples <strong>of</strong> the three types <strong>of</strong><br />

approaches<br />

described above. Given the small number <strong>of</strong> interviewed companies, the present<br />

work was not intended to provide generalisable results; nevertheless, there are some<br />

considerations which can be drawn. First, the case-study analysis reveals that the<br />

environmental impact <strong>of</strong> a company's process/ product, and therefore <strong>of</strong> its industry,<br />

plays a very significant role. The interest elicited in public opinion, and the many<br />

environmental regulations, have prompted companies operating in sectors such as<br />

energy or utilities to implement environmental management and performance<br />

measurement systems. Moreover, in these industries, environmental strategies and<br />

green product development are becoming an increasingly important way for<br />

companies to differentiate themselves and acquire customers sensitive to these issues<br />

and attentive to conservation (Runhaar et all, 2008; Albino et all, 2009).<br />

95

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!