29.01.2013 Views

University of Vaasa - Vaasan yliopisto

University of Vaasa - Vaasan yliopisto

University of Vaasa - Vaasan yliopisto

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

702<br />

However neither Japan nor Germany is evaluated as a good contributor to CSR for<br />

which environmental protection plays a significant role. For instance, ‘National<br />

Corporate Responsibility Index (NCRI)’ issued by the cooperation program <strong>of</strong> the<br />

think tank ‘Copenhagen Centre’ and the British government ranked Japan and<br />

Germany 18 th and 9 th <strong>of</strong> OECD countries 2 . In addition to that, their self-image about<br />

CSR is also surprisingly low. Habisch and Wegner (2004) said that Germany is<br />

likely to be a ‘white spot’ on the European CSR landscape, or more, CSR “has been<br />

ignored for a long time not only by business but also by other sectors including<br />

NGOs as well as the government”(Backhaus-Maul 2008). In Japan also many<br />

scholars think Japan is still a country which imports CSR (Fujii 2005). A consensus<br />

about CSR in Japan and Germany is that both have seriously observed CSR since the<br />

beginning <strong>of</strong> the 21 st century.<br />

As long as I know there are many empirical literatures focusing on the current<br />

development <strong>of</strong> acknowledge about CSR and the historical picture <strong>of</strong> CSR in both<br />

countries, but just few try to explore what and how blocked CSR development in<br />

Japan and Germany or how the linkage <strong>of</strong> CSR and environmental protection has<br />

changed there. Especially there are very little comparative analyses <strong>of</strong> CSR<br />

development <strong>of</strong> these two countries.<br />

This paper thus tries to <strong>of</strong>fer the idea how we can compare the path <strong>of</strong> CSR<br />

development cross nationally from the perspective <strong>of</strong> barriers. I know that this<br />

suggestion sounds tricky. However this should make an interesting comparative view<br />

for CSR researches which mostly pick up best practices.<br />

Framework <strong>of</strong> the Research<br />

Research Agenda<br />

Japan and Germany are for me very interesting cases because they are likely to have<br />

started to discuss about CSR at the same period, namely in the beginning <strong>of</strong> the 21 st<br />

century. However they did not start their discussion from scratch. In fact Japanese<br />

and German companies have the tradition <strong>of</strong> contributions to the society. Besides<br />

high engagement in corporate environmental management including ISO 14001,<br />

“Sampo-Yoshi” in Japan and “organisierte Bürgerschaft“in Germany are the<br />

argument <strong>of</strong>ten seized as the traditional examples <strong>of</strong> Japan and Germany’s CSR.<br />

They are likely not to have sufficiently used their potential <strong>of</strong> CSR although they<br />

have a tradition <strong>of</strong> social contribution. Questions are therefore why they did not<br />

relatively low engage in CSR and what drove or hampered the development <strong>of</strong> CSR<br />

in both countries. As above argued, it is <strong>of</strong>ten said that Japan and Germany started to<br />

seriously observe CSR in the beginning <strong>of</strong> 21 st century. This paper looks at the<br />

situation changed at that time, exactly to say the period from the end <strong>of</strong> the 20 th<br />

century to 2003 is targeted in this paper. Through looking at what diminished or was<br />

weakened at that time, this paper would explore the barriers blocked the development<br />

<strong>of</strong> CSR, and differences or similarities <strong>of</strong> changes in two countries.<br />

2 For more details see: (EABIS and AccountAbility 2005)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!