29.01.2013 Views

University of Vaasa - Vaasan yliopisto

University of Vaasa - Vaasan yliopisto

University of Vaasa - Vaasan yliopisto

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Conclusion<br />

842<br />

The described perception and behavioural patterns, routines the decision-makers are<br />

stuck in, pose a threat for SMEs. Both the presented ideal roles in which decisions<br />

are made more impede than support a timely preparation for an intensified discourse<br />

and demands regarding CR. SMEs have to make up leeway and need to take a closer<br />

look at what different stakeholders demand. They need to work on CR in core<br />

business activities, organisational integration and have to prepare for increasing<br />

importance <strong>of</strong> certification and labels and accompanying management systems and<br />

instruments, even though this is not considered the way SMEs work.<br />

It is no surprise that most SMEs don’t associate their social and environmental values<br />

and measures with the concept <strong>of</strong> CR (because it is normal for the responsible<br />

businessman) and regard CR as a threat (from a management point <strong>of</strong> view). „In<br />

most cases, the term CSR is not a concept that makes people feel comfortable or one<br />

with which they can identify“ (Murillo & Lozano 2006). There has been research on<br />

how the concept CR can be made useful for SMEs, how small- and medium-sized<br />

management can be supported etc., but what we tried to highlight is that established<br />

patterns <strong>of</strong> perception and SMEs’ culture have to change too.<br />

As we observe robust patterns <strong>of</strong> perception and behaviour, structural influences<br />

much more than individual aspects should <strong>of</strong>fer explanations. These have to be<br />

analysed in more depth. Global and national society’s view on sustainability issues<br />

and corporate responsibility influence decision-makers in large companies as well.<br />

But we also know that the pr<strong>of</strong>essional social environment that corporate actors<br />

move in differs with company size. The global business-class elite <strong>of</strong> big companies’<br />

management (incidentally including the leaders <strong>of</strong> the bigger NGOs, Shell 2002)<br />

most likely develops different structures <strong>of</strong> meaning than SMEs’ owner-managers,<br />

much more embedded in the local community. Also, it has to be asked whether<br />

society has different expectations and views on the scope for actions <strong>of</strong> differentsized<br />

companies. The much bigger trust in SMEs regarding social and environmental<br />

aspects for example is not backed up by the width and depth <strong>of</strong> CR performance and<br />

reporting. Last but not least we have to observe the structures emerging right now, as<br />

CR still is in a very dynamic state <strong>of</strong> uncertainty and change (<strong>of</strong> meaning, power and<br />

rules).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!