29.01.2013 Views

University of Vaasa - Vaasan yliopisto

University of Vaasa - Vaasan yliopisto

University of Vaasa - Vaasan yliopisto

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

the GBOs sustainability practices and programs, and the (entire) business<br />

chain, including suppliers, internal activities, and customers. There is no<br />

equivalent component in ISO14001.<br />

7. A continuous improvement feedback loop based on Deming’s PDCA<br />

principle, with performance measurement and assurance processes, is<br />

provided by module seven. This provides a sustainability (rather than<br />

environmental) system functionality similar to ISO14001 part 4.5 and 4.6.<br />

These seven components are further divided into seventy-three attributes (Table 1).<br />

To provide a tool for maturity testing (assessing the degree <strong>of</strong> implementation <strong>of</strong> the<br />

system in an organization), three levels <strong>of</strong> maturity have been assigned to each <strong>of</strong><br />

these 73 attributes, and a scoring system has been applied to these maturity tests<br />

(with a maximum score <strong>of</strong> 219 points).<br />

We recognize that there are a number <strong>of</strong> important limitations with this type <strong>of</strong><br />

scoring system:<br />

� All seventy-three attributes have been assigned the same value, although they<br />

may not have equal importance in the sustainability management process. In<br />

fact importance may vary across business sectors or geographically<br />

� The more (<strong>of</strong> the 73) attributes a system component has, the more value is<br />

assigned to it in the overall scoring<br />

� Improvement (growth) in achievement is scored in a disproportionate manner,<br />

as Level 2 is 200% <strong>of</strong> Level 1, but Level 3 is (only) 150% <strong>of</strong> Level 2<br />

� The use <strong>of</strong> three levels <strong>of</strong> maturity is, to some extent, arbitrary and systems<br />

with five, or more levels are used<br />

These limitations are symptomatic <strong>of</strong> all maturity and benchmarking systems, and at<br />

present we have chosen not to introduce any weighting or normalizing features. In<br />

fact these are problems with any such system, not only with this one. Our system<br />

reflects established practices, is useful for tracking progress with time, and is simple<br />

to use.<br />

Conclusions<br />

Having reviewed the definitions <strong>of</strong> a GBO and then discussed the sustainability<br />

management requirements that are specific to GBOs, we have presented a new<br />

management system that has been developed to address these requirements. We<br />

argue that this system is much more suited to application in GBOs than existing<br />

environmental management systems.<br />

In particular, we believe this system is more suitable for implementation in GBOs<br />

than ISO14011, which was designed to be applicable in all organizations, but is not<br />

45

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!