29.01.2013 Views

University of Vaasa - Vaasan yliopisto

University of Vaasa - Vaasan yliopisto

University of Vaasa - Vaasan yliopisto

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Environmentally Responsible Image Differentiation<br />

129<br />

It was found that treating stakeholders as one group (in case <strong>of</strong> strategic CR) is an<br />

unacceptable loose and inaccurate viewpoint. This is because a firm has a myriad<br />

amount <strong>of</strong> stakeholders with different expectations and various interests that are<br />

<strong>of</strong>ten (also) contradictive – a firm is incapable to cater all <strong>of</strong> its stakeholders.<br />

Therefore this study used an modified approach to stakeholder theory (Freeman<br />

1984) that can be referred as the key stakeholder approach.<br />

In the model (Figure 1) the key stakeholders are identified and divided into internal<br />

and external parties. In this specific case study, corporate responsibility was<br />

internally driven (starting from internal stakeholder) by the team members. CR can<br />

also be driven by external stakeholders, i.e. externally driven corporate<br />

responsibility. In this case study, the external key stakeholders were not driving the<br />

CR – yet they did become active after the case company started to supply CR. This<br />

study proposes that [P5] if a demand for corporate responsibility does not exist, firms<br />

can hasten its emergence by supplying corporate responsibility.<br />

In addition to internal and external key stakeholders, there exists key stakeholders<br />

that belong to both and/or neither parties, e.g. shareholders. Especially, the interests<br />

and the amount <strong>of</strong> initiative are distinctive factors between stakeholders and key<br />

stakeholders. In the case company the shareholders lacked interest in CR.<br />

Figure 1. Key stakeholder approach to image differentiation<br />

According to the revised model, a firm can differentiate itself with an environmental<br />

responsible image. This image is a perception in the key stakeholders (both in<br />

internal and external) and results as internal and external differentiators that can<br />

enhance firm’s strategic position. The internal differentiators and benefits <strong>of</strong> an<br />

environmental image are: a more preferred employer, an enchanced employees’<br />

motivation, and cost savings. The external differentiators or benefits <strong>of</strong> an

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!