29.01.2013 Views

University of Vaasa - Vaasan yliopisto

University of Vaasa - Vaasan yliopisto

University of Vaasa - Vaasan yliopisto

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

254<br />

Burchell, J., Cook, J. 2008. Stakeholder dialogue and organisational learning:<br />

changing relationships between companies and NGOs. Business Ethics: A European<br />

Review, 17, 35r46.<br />

Cheney, G., Christensen, L.T. 2001. Organizational communication: linkages<br />

between internal and external communication In Jablin, F.M. and Putnam, L. (Eds.),<br />

The New Handbook <strong>of</strong> Organizational Communication: Advances in Theory,<br />

Research, and Methods, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.<br />

Clarkson, M. B. E. 1995. A stakeholder framework for analysing and evaluating<br />

corporate social performance. Academy <strong>of</strong> Management Review, 20: 92-117.<br />

CorporateRegister. 2008. The CSR Assurance Statement Report.<br />

CorporateRegister.com Limited, www.corporateregister.com, astudy<br />

Cousins, J. B., Whitmore, E. 1998. Framing Participatory Evaluation. New<br />

Directions for Evaluation, no 80 (5-23).<br />

Crane, A., Livesey, S. 2003. Are you talking to me? Stakeholder communication and<br />

the risks and rewards <strong>of</strong> dialogue, in Andri<strong>of</strong>, J., Waddock, S., Husted, B. and<br />

Rahman, S. (Eds). Unfolding Stakeholder Thinking 2, Sheffield: Greenleaf<br />

Publishing, pp. 39-52.<br />

Dahlsrud, A. 2006. How corporate social responsibility is defined: an analysis <strong>of</strong> 37<br />

definitions. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management.<br />

Published online in Wiley InterScience, DOI: 10.1002, csr.132.<br />

Davidson, E.J. 2005. Evaluation methodology basics. The nuts and bolts <strong>of</strong> sound<br />

evaluation, Thousand Oaks, London, New Delhi: SAGE publications.<br />

Dawkins, J., Lewis, S. 2003. CSR in Stakeholder Expectations and their Implication<br />

for Company Strategy. Journal <strong>of</strong> Business Ethics 44(2–3), 185–193.<br />

Doane, D. 2004. Good intentions-bad outcomes? The broken promise <strong>of</strong> corporate<br />

social<br />

responsibility. Chapter 8 in A. Henriques & J. Richardson (eds) The Triple Bottom<br />

Line: Does it all add up? , London: Earthscan Publishers.<br />

Donaldson, T., Preston, L.E. 1995. The stakeholder theory <strong>of</strong> the corporation:<br />

concepts, evidence and implications. Academy <strong>of</strong> Management Review, 29:1, 65–91.<br />

Duraiappah, A.K. et al. 2005. Have participatory approaches increased capabilities?,<br />

Winnipeg: IISD. URL: http:, , www.iisd.org, pdf, 2005, economics_participatory<br />

_approaches.pdf .<br />

European Commission, Directorate-General for Employment and Social Affairs,<br />

Unit D.1: Corporate Social Responsibility. 2002. A business contribution to<br />

sustainable development. Communication from the Commission, COM(2002) 347<br />

final. URL, http:,ec.europa.eu, employment_social, soc-dial, csr, csr2002_col_en.pdf

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!