29.01.2013 Views

University of Vaasa - Vaasan yliopisto

University of Vaasa - Vaasan yliopisto

University of Vaasa - Vaasan yliopisto

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Environment Energy company<br />

Management<br />

Figure 1: Energy company and the three strategies for complexity reduction. Source:<br />

Achterbergh & Vriens, 2009 (adapted from Beer 1995).<br />

This is a energy company modelled as a viable system containing a set <strong>of</strong> viable<br />

systems. It is organized in the (order)streams wind, solar and tidal energy. Each <strong>of</strong><br />

these streams is a viable system with its own primary activity activity, , its own management,<br />

its own relevant environment, it its s own attenuators and amplifiers, and its own<br />

input/output relations.<br />

The oval shapes repre represent the primary activities, providing respectively wind, solar,<br />

and tidal energy. The he small boxes on the right side <strong>of</strong> the oval shapes rep represent the<br />

management <strong>of</strong> these primary activities. EEach<br />

<strong>of</strong> the management boxes has its own<br />

attenuators and nd amplifiers (curved single tipped arrows). Each ach <strong>of</strong> these viable<br />

systems has its own relevant envi environment ronment (the shapes on the left side as part <strong>of</strong> the<br />

total environment). TThe<br />

he curved arrows represent attenuators and amplifiers, and the<br />

double tipped arrows represent input/output relations between each viable system and<br />

its environment.<br />

Organizations depend on and contribute to a larger environment. Using the viable<br />

system model this larger environment can be modelled as sets <strong>of</strong> viable systems to<br />

which the organization zation contributes, such as an organizational network, the economy<br />

or the society it is part <strong>of</strong> (Achterbergh & Vriens 2009). On the basis <strong>of</strong> the VSM it<br />

can be analyzed zed how the viability <strong>of</strong> the organization and its contribution to these<br />

systems (networks, society) to which it be belongs longs can be improved by changes in the<br />

organizational design (strategy <strong>of</strong> upward recursion).<br />

For example, in order to avoid unwanted side side-effects effects <strong>of</strong> organizational performance<br />

on both society and the ecological environment, societal subsystems can develop<br />

30<br />

on both society and the ecological environment, societal subsystems can develop - in<br />

30<br />

The performance <strong>of</strong> an organization can be defined as ‘the set <strong>of</strong> input/output relations <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong> an organization to<br />

other societal subsystems, ems, based on its primary activities’ (Teubner, 1985:163). Through their performance<br />

organizations contribute to the realization <strong>of</strong> the function <strong>of</strong> a societal subsystem. For example, by way <strong>of</strong> its<br />

output a company can contribute to the function <strong>of</strong> the econ economic omic subsystem: ensuring the satisfaction <strong>of</strong><br />

future social needs.<br />

336

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!