29.01.2013 Views

University of Vaasa - Vaasan yliopisto

University of Vaasa - Vaasan yliopisto

University of Vaasa - Vaasan yliopisto

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

820<br />

This paper draws on both primary and secondary data and looks at three case studies<br />

<strong>of</strong> UK-based SMEs. The research intends to investigate the specific characteristics <strong>of</strong><br />

sustainable entrepreneurship in these companies and looks for the commonalities<br />

therein. It looks at start-up issues and investigates how the principles <strong>of</strong> sustainability<br />

versus those <strong>of</strong> growth and pr<strong>of</strong>it play out in the small company arena. The study<br />

seeks to analyse both the entrepreneurial characteristics <strong>of</strong> the ecopreneur and the<br />

defining eco-elements <strong>of</strong> the business. The first <strong>of</strong> the case studies is Pachacuti©, a<br />

fair trade clothes business run by Carry Somers. The second is Ecocabin, an<br />

environmental holiday business run by Kate Grub and the third is Bricks and Bread -<br />

a sustainable building organisation run by Trudy Thompson.<br />

Literature Review<br />

The phenomenon <strong>of</strong> ecopreneurship is still an emerging one and its literature is a<br />

comparatively young (see Linnanen, 2002, Pastakia, 1998, Schaltegger, 2002.) A<br />

working definition is <strong>of</strong>fered to us by Schaltegger (2002): “ecopreneurship can be<br />

roughly defined as ‘entrepreneurship through an environmental lens'. This paper will<br />

build on this comparatively young literature base and will focus on a particular<br />

element within the broader definition <strong>of</strong> ecopreneurship - sustainable<br />

entrepreneurship in SMEs. One <strong>of</strong> the main thrusts in the literature is the<br />

development <strong>of</strong> a typology <strong>of</strong> ecopreneurs, defined by Pastakia (1998) to be “a new<br />

breed <strong>of</strong> eco-conscious change agents who may be called ecological entrepreneurs<br />

(ecopreneurs for short.) Individuals or institutions that attempt to popularise ec<strong>of</strong>riendly<br />

ideas and innovations either through the market or non-market roots may be<br />

referred to as ecopreneurs.” As yet there is little consensus on such typology and<br />

little distinction <strong>of</strong> the particular behaviours <strong>of</strong> SMEs. One <strong>of</strong> the more common<br />

distinctions however, is the delineation between social and commercial ecopreneurs<br />

according to their objectives. Linnanen (2002) seems to agree stating that<br />

ecopreneurs can be classified according to 2 criteria: 1: their desire to change the<br />

world and improve the quality <strong>of</strong> the environment and life, and 2: their desire to<br />

make money and grow as a business venture. He goes on to say that: “these two<br />

dimensions seem to be independent. The first dimension <strong>of</strong> pursuing the good life,<br />

like sustainability, is an acceptable goal but it is primarily an inefficient business<br />

concept” (Linnanen, 2002). Linnanen typifies ecopreneurs along these conflicting<br />

axes and notably a high “desire to change the world” coupled with a low “desire to<br />

make money” results, in this typology at least, in a “non-pr<strong>of</strong>it business.”

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!