29.01.2013 Views

University of Vaasa - Vaasan yliopisto

University of Vaasa - Vaasan yliopisto

University of Vaasa - Vaasan yliopisto

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

561<br />

Nevertheless, as agricultural activity is expected to increase in the future, due (partly)<br />

to bioenergy demand, conversion <strong>of</strong> areas with high biodiversity value or<br />

introduction <strong>of</strong> more productive but invading species is a risk. This relation is thus<br />

assumed to be inverse, even if, in some cases, land-use changes can improve<br />

biodiversity.<br />

Greenhouse Gases Emissions – Global Warming – Biodiversity<br />

GHG emissions influence biodiversity indirectly through their impacts on global<br />

warming (see figure 5).<br />

Figure 5 - Impacts <strong>of</strong> GHG emissions on biodiversity<br />

GHG emissions are correlated to global warming and global warming influences<br />

biodiversity, through climate change (temperature variations, rainfall disturbances,<br />

sea level rise, etc.). This influence can be either negative or positive. Even if it is<br />

generally felt negative it is for instance possible that a raise in temperature lead to an<br />

improvement <strong>of</strong> biodiversity, according to local conditions. This relation is therefore<br />

indeterminate.<br />

Agricultural Practices – Biodiversity<br />

Figure 6 shows that, directly or through their influence on environment quality,<br />

agricultural practices as fertilisers and pesticides application, soil structure alteration<br />

and /or Genetically Modified Organism (GMO) introduction impact biodiversity.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!