29.01.2013 Views

University of Vaasa - Vaasan yliopisto

University of Vaasa - Vaasan yliopisto

University of Vaasa - Vaasan yliopisto

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Regarding the activity S2 ‘Stakeholder Analysis’: this should be part <strong>of</strong> the VSMfunction<br />

‘Intelligence’(F4) 31 .<br />

343<br />

When resources <strong>of</strong> stakeholders are deployed in innovation processes, the function<br />

‘Control’ (F3) is responsible for the organization and cohesion <strong>of</strong> the primary<br />

activities carried out in this network <strong>of</strong> stakeholders. Knowledge about how these<br />

stakeholder networks should be managed lies in the control function. The control<br />

function must have knowledge <strong>of</strong> what the cooperation with stakeholders may<br />

provide and what impact this will have on the viability, i.e. the realization and<br />

adaptation <strong>of</strong> goals <strong>of</strong> the organization. The function ‘Intelligence’ (F4) studies the<br />

same network <strong>of</strong> stakeholders, but with the perspective <strong>of</strong> the future (‘outside and<br />

then’): e.g. is this the best competence basis, are there other stakeholders with whom<br />

we could work together etc.<br />

In general, the VSM functions F3 (control), F4 (Intelligence) and F5 (Policy) ensure<br />

the adaptation <strong>of</strong> the identity and goals <strong>of</strong> the organization and deal with questions<br />

like: what is our contribution to society, what are the possible side-effects and<br />

dysfunctions <strong>of</strong> our business, which stakeholders could we involve in corporate<br />

responsible innovation processes?<br />

In the alignment between the functions Control and Intelligence perspectives <strong>of</strong><br />

stakeholders (knowledge lies with the Intelligence function) are balanced against the<br />

organizational capacity and available resources (this knowledge lies in the Control<br />

function). In this way, with the help <strong>of</strong> the VSM, it can be determined which<br />

organizational functions should be involved in different activities regarding<br />

stakeholders and how they should be linked to one another.<br />

Ad. 2. Sociotechnical theory provides then the instruments to develop a concrete<br />

organizational structure to realize these functions and their required relations (see<br />

section 3). In this way the combination <strong>of</strong> the VSM and sociotechnical theory can<br />

form a basis <strong>of</strong> a tool for an effective engagement <strong>of</strong> stakeholders in innovation <strong>of</strong><br />

products and processes, and especially for anchoring this in the organizational<br />

structure.<br />

Conclusion<br />

The Viable System Model describes the functions and their required relations an<br />

organization must produce in order to be able to realize and adapt its goals.<br />

Sociotechnical theory <strong>of</strong>fers the concrete structural instruments for this. Within the<br />

general knowledge/decision domains coupled to the functions <strong>of</strong> the VSM (primary<br />

activities, coordination, control, intelligence and policy) and their relations, sub<br />

domains can be distinguished concerning the activities towards stakeholders<br />

(regarding their involvement in CSR and innovation processes). In a concrete<br />

31 The intelligence function focuses on developments in the environment <strong>of</strong> the company. This signifies in the<br />

first place the spotting <strong>of</strong> opportunities and threats in the longer term. The intelligence function focuses on what<br />

Beer calls “the outside and then”.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!