29.01.2013 Views

University of Vaasa - Vaasan yliopisto

University of Vaasa - Vaasan yliopisto

University of Vaasa - Vaasan yliopisto

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

193<br />

power is distributed unequally. Power distance explains the behaviour <strong>of</strong> individuals<br />

in reaction to differences in physical and intellectual capacities which could be<br />

translated to power, wealth and status. In this research, the power distance from the<br />

organizational point <strong>of</strong> view and consequently the state condition is looked at. From<br />

the perspective <strong>of</strong> organizations, especially in relations between boss-subordinate,<br />

H<strong>of</strong>stede’s (2000) research proves that Danish corporations have a lower power<br />

distance in comparison to Chinese corporations. Societies with small power distances<br />

such as Denmark emphasize on equal rights <strong>of</strong> which skills, wealth, power and status<br />

need not go together. On the other hand, China, showing a large power distance, is<br />

the exact opposite, in which the person with power is perceived to be right and they<br />

also have special privileges.<br />

(ii) Individualism vs. Collectivism<br />

Individualism and its antonym collectivism, is about whose interest takes precedence;<br />

is it the interests <strong>of</strong> the individual or is it the interests <strong>of</strong> the group as a whole?<br />

H<strong>of</strong>stede (1991) defines this dimension as follows: Individualism pertains to<br />

societies in which the ties between individuals are loose: everyone is expected to look<br />

after himself or herself and his or her immediate family. Collectivism as its opposite<br />

pertains to societies in which people from birth onwards are integrated into strong,<br />

cohesive ingroups, which throughout people’s lifetime continue to protect them in<br />

exchange for unquestioning loyalty. An important characteristic <strong>of</strong> individualist<br />

society is that social conversations are important in that there is a constant need for<br />

verbal communication and that silence is considered abnormal. However, for a<br />

collectivist society, the act <strong>of</strong> being together in a social setting is considered<br />

sufficient and <strong>of</strong>ten there is no compulsory communication unless there is a need to<br />

convey information. H<strong>of</strong>stede (2000) was also able to make the association that<br />

countries which show medium to low individualism index (IDV) scores usually have<br />

a form <strong>of</strong> state capitalism. This also corresponds with the high likelihood <strong>of</strong> the state<br />

having a more dominating role in the economic system. Similar association can be<br />

made with regards to freedom <strong>of</strong> press in that low IDV scores are usually correlated<br />

with more controlled mass media. China which scored the lowest IDV, show all<br />

these characteristics <strong>of</strong> this collectivists’ nature. It is the exact opposite with<br />

Denmark. Despite Denmark sharing a similar agricultural background as China,<br />

Denmark scored high IDV. This could be explained by national wealth relation, in<br />

that the wealthier a country, the higher the individualism trait. Denmark also went<br />

through modernization much earlier than China did, thus making this an important<br />

factor for driving pursuits <strong>of</strong> self-interests to increase wealth.<br />

(iii) Masculinity vs. Femininity<br />

The third dimension, discusses about gender roles that are either masculine or<br />

feminine. While masculinity is associated with assertiveness and competition,<br />

femininity is related to nurturance and concern for relationships and for the living<br />

environment. In societal terms, a masculine society has distinct social gender roles in<br />

that men should be assertive, tough and focused on material success, while women

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!