29.01.2013 Views

University of Vaasa - Vaasan yliopisto

University of Vaasa - Vaasan yliopisto

University of Vaasa - Vaasan yliopisto

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

threats are more likely to succeed by establishing a competitive advantage over their<br />

competition” (Friedman & Friedman 2009).<br />

120<br />

The purpose <strong>of</strong> this research paper is to explore and analyze strategic implications <strong>of</strong><br />

CR. The study aims at increasing the understanding <strong>of</strong> the phenomena with a model<br />

building approach that is based on the stakeholder theory (cf. Freeman 1984). The<br />

main problem is phrased as follows: how a firm can differentiate with corporate<br />

responsibility (CR) and in particular with an environmentally responsible image?<br />

Because <strong>of</strong> the non-existence <strong>of</strong> antecedent models the stress <strong>of</strong> the study is on<br />

theoretical reasoning, however an empical case study is conducted to support the<br />

working propositions and theoretical framework. The selected case is a hotel chain,<br />

Scandic, and the dissected context is the Swedish-Finnish hospitality industry.<br />

Theoretical Framework<br />

This chapter presents the concepts, reviews the strategy approach and aims at<br />

developing five working propositions.<br />

Corporate Responsibility<br />

The concept <strong>of</strong> corporate responsibility (CR), a part <strong>of</strong> the entity <strong>of</strong> corporate<br />

sustainability, consists <strong>of</strong> economic responsibility, environmental responsibility (Van<br />

Marrewijk 2003), and socio-cultural responsibility (Ketola 2008). Corporate<br />

responsibility cannot and does not equal to sustainability, because responsibility is<br />

relative and sustainability is absolute (Ketola 2005, 2007). In this study CR is<br />

considered as a voluntary task, meaning that companies do more than laws and<br />

regulations acquire (cf. Carroll 1979).<br />

CR impacts the organizational culture, which requires the development <strong>of</strong> new<br />

shared values, as well as strategic embedding within organization <strong>of</strong> the three pillars:<br />

people, planet and pr<strong>of</strong>it (Cramer 2005).<br />

Strategic CR is one way to execute corporate responsibility. The aim is to create a<br />

win-win-win situation, in which the CR ables the people, planet and pr<strong>of</strong>it to prosper.<br />

Moreover, CR becomes strategic when it yields substantial business-related benefits<br />

to the firm, in particular by supporting core business activities and thus contributes to<br />

the firm's effectiveness in accomplishing its mission (Burke & Logsdon 1996).<br />

Differentiation Strategy<br />

Each industry has its own characteristics and reacts uniquely to external and internal<br />

changes. Also in the case <strong>of</strong> corporate responsibility (CR), not all industries behave<br />

in a similar manner because <strong>of</strong> non-equal exposure to CR challenges. Peng (2006)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!