29.01.2013 Views

University of Vaasa - Vaasan yliopisto

University of Vaasa - Vaasan yliopisto

University of Vaasa - Vaasan yliopisto

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

B2. Knowledge and<br />

development<br />

B3. Occupational<br />

health and safety<br />

B4. Equal<br />

opportunities<br />

employees<br />

13. Employee turnover<br />

14. Age structure<br />

15. Redundancies<br />

16. Percentage <strong>of</strong><br />

employees with regular<br />

development discussions<br />

17. Training days<br />

18. Lost time due to<br />

injuries. The frequency <strong>of</strong><br />

injuries<br />

Human capital value and<br />

competence development<br />

Cost <strong>of</strong> lost days<br />

19. Absence rate<br />

20. Gender structure Employee satisfaction<br />

360<br />

Based on these 20 performance indicators, we reviewed the sustainability reports <strong>of</strong><br />

18 listed Finnish companies from the year 2006 in order to see whether they provide<br />

an analysis <strong>of</strong> the financial value drivers behind sustainability performance or<br />

expressed sustainability information in financial terms. We ascertained that none <strong>of</strong><br />

the companies provided directly this kind <strong>of</strong> information or analysis in their<br />

sustainability reports. The reports fail to make a link between a company’s<br />

sustainability strategy and performance and its overall business strategy and<br />

performance. They also fail to explain how sustainability trends and drivers are<br />

linked to market factors driving corporate strategy and how these trends affect the<br />

company’s financial outcomes.<br />

The reports are characterized by an absence <strong>of</strong> discussion on financial value analysis.<br />

Relevant sustainability data is scattered and therefore difficult to use for valuation<br />

purposes. This is partly explained by the fact that sustainability reporting practices<br />

are in an early, developing, stage <strong>of</strong> their development and reporting<br />

recommendations in this area are not yet fully implemented and integrated in<br />

companies’ operations.<br />

Our sample gave additional evidence that the current level <strong>of</strong> sustainable reporting is<br />

clearly not comprehensive enough for valuation purposes. In other words, in terms <strong>of</strong><br />

our three-phase classification, firms are, at best, in phase two. In the next section, we<br />

display three examples <strong>of</strong> how information disclosed in phase two can be developed<br />

further to become phase three information, where GRI is integrated into external<br />

reporting and internal performance management purposes.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!