University of Vaasa - Vaasan yliopisto

659
Notes: 40 CR reports were considered in each of the three risk zones giving a
maximum score of 40 for each survey category, with a total of 120 reports being
surveyed.
The distribution of Biodiversity Consideration Score (BCS) ( 0 to 3 - taken from the
criteria given in Table 3), is shown within each risk zone. Maximum frequency
scores are in bold, modal frequency scores are shaded grey.
Overall Analysis of Results
Table 5 is a synthesis of the findings from Table 4 and summarises the most common
levels of consideration in each biodiversity risk zone with respect to the survey
categories.
Table 5 Most Common Level of Biodiversity Consideration in Survey Reports
Survey
Category
A (Supply
Chain)
Red Risk Zone
Level of
Biodiversity
Consideration
Amber Risk
Zone Level of
Biodiversity
Consideration
Green Risk
Zone Level of
Biodiversity
Consideration
Most
common
level
across
risk
zones
Poor None Poor Poor
B (CR Report) Good Good Good Good
C (F C EMS) None Poor None None
D
(Sustainability)
E
(Landholdings)
Most common
level across all
survey
categories
Good Poor / Moderate Poor Poor
Good None None None
Good Poor
None/Poor