29.01.2013 Views

University of Vaasa - Vaasan yliopisto

University of Vaasa - Vaasan yliopisto

University of Vaasa - Vaasan yliopisto

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

ecological requirements may find their conventional way <strong>of</strong> operating fundamentally<br />

challenged (Arnold 2007):<br />

314<br />

- Processes, products and services need to be rethought and rearranged<br />

- Completely new information and ways <strong>of</strong> thinking as well as new business<br />

models and business ethics need to be integrated into management decisionmaking<br />

processes<br />

- New ways <strong>of</strong> external and internal communications with groups <strong>of</strong><br />

stakeholders need to be identified and implemented<br />

- Companies’ basic values and knowledge systems need to be reflected and<br />

changed.<br />

These challenges will require new or recombined knowledge or ideas and<br />

fundamental changes in corporate strategy and objectives for the majority <strong>of</strong> all<br />

companies (Arnold 2007; Teece et al. 1998). Therefore, the use <strong>of</strong> open innovation<br />

methods (OIM) and corporate learning become a key element <strong>of</strong> any effort to<br />

implement CR and sustainability effectively within companies.<br />

Although there is an extensive literature on the actions that have been taken by<br />

companies, such as developing new modes <strong>of</strong> production and new products, initiating<br />

new modes <strong>of</strong> participation or stakeholder engagement, less attention has been paid<br />

to the role OIM and organisational learning play in influencing CR actions taken by<br />

companies. With respect to open innovation methods, various stakeholders<br />

representing different social positions and interests, such as NGOs, investors,<br />

government bodies or consumers, can be integrated in open innovation processes (to<br />

strengthen CR). Integrating users into the planning and development <strong>of</strong> innovative<br />

products and services <strong>of</strong>fer the following advantages: Asking future users about their<br />

needs, ideas and solutions and taking this knowledge into consideration at an early<br />

stage in the innovation process increases the likelihood that the final product will be<br />

accepted and successfully spread in the marketplace. Additionally, regarding<br />

sustainability/CR the social-ecological effects <strong>of</strong> sustainable consumption and<br />

production can <strong>of</strong>ten be ascertained at an early point in time. The wide variations in<br />

corporate responses to CR and sustainability open up a series <strong>of</strong> questions around:<br />

- When and why do companies use OIM to integrate sustainability and socialecological<br />

responsibility into business practices and strategies?<br />

- What effects do these innovations generated by OIM have on CR?<br />

- What do OIM promote or inhibit regarding CR?<br />

Even though the management studies literature provides answers to these questions<br />

in the broader context <strong>of</strong> corporate strategy, little has been written specifically on<br />

OIM and CR. Shown the weaknesses in the theoretical frameworks, this chapter<br />

seeks to advance the literature by examining empirical evidence from six Germanbased<br />

companies in the fields <strong>of</strong> housing and construction, mobility and<br />

transportation as well as diet which used OIM to develop sustainability innovations.<br />

The article consists <strong>of</strong> six sections: sustainable change and CR, open innovation<br />

methods, conceptual framework and methodology, results, conclusions and<br />

consequences.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!