29.01.2013 Views

University of Vaasa - Vaasan yliopisto

University of Vaasa - Vaasan yliopisto

University of Vaasa - Vaasan yliopisto

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Alongside the literature on the strategic value <strong>of</strong> CSR, there is a second line <strong>of</strong><br />

research that concerns itself with analyzing the CSR management process, the tools<br />

companies can use to communicate their efforts in the CSR arena, and the<br />

organizational roles and departments which can be instituted to support the<br />

systematization and formalization <strong>of</strong> CSR activities. In this connection, a number <strong>of</strong><br />

standard management systems have been developed by national and international<br />

bodies and organizations, relating to different aspects <strong>of</strong> CSR (e.g. environmental<br />

and quality standards from ISO) or to the process for auditing and reporting CSR<br />

data (e.g. AA1000).<br />

In the literature, the integration <strong>of</strong> CSR into business strategy and the adoption <strong>of</strong><br />

formal tools for its management are <strong>of</strong>ten explored as two facets <strong>of</strong> implementing<br />

CSR within a firm, on the assumption that they must <strong>of</strong> necessity progress in parallel.<br />

In practice, though, companies can attribute strong strategic import to CSR without<br />

formalizing its managerial process or, conversely, they can adopt formal systems <strong>of</strong><br />

management and reporting without fully exploiting the strategic advantages afforded<br />

by CSR. This may depend on a number <strong>of</strong> variables, such as the industry in which a<br />

firm operates, its critical success factors, its corporate culture, etc. The goal <strong>of</strong> the<br />

present work is therefore to first examine the strategic relevance and formalization<br />

aspects separately, and then put them in relation with each other to identify the<br />

different approaches that companies can take to implementing CSR. More<br />

specifically, the detailed objectives <strong>of</strong> the study, each corresponding to a section <strong>of</strong><br />

this paper, are as follows:<br />

� To analyze the concept <strong>of</strong> strategic CSR (as defined in the<br />

literature), and to identify a set <strong>of</strong> variables that can be used to<br />

measure the level <strong>of</strong> integration <strong>of</strong> CSR into business strategy,<br />

hereafter also called the strategic relevance <strong>of</strong> CSR<br />

� To analyze the literature contributions dealing with the<br />

managerial processes and the formal and operational tools<br />

which companies can adopt to tackle the structured aspects <strong>of</strong><br />

CSR, and to identify a set <strong>of</strong> variables that can be used to<br />

measure the degree <strong>of</strong> formalization <strong>of</strong> the CSR management<br />

process.<br />

� To put the strategic relevance and formalization aspects in<br />

relation with each other,constructing a two-dimensional matrix,<br />

and to describe the different approaches which companies can<br />

take to CSR, depending on which <strong>of</strong> the two aspects prevails.<br />

� To provide some examples <strong>of</strong> these different approaches,<br />

drawn from the analysis <strong>of</strong> empirical case studies, and suggest<br />

some characteristics <strong>of</strong> firms which may influence their choice<br />

<strong>of</strong> approach.<br />

84

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!