29.01.2013 Views

University of Vaasa - Vaasan yliopisto

University of Vaasa - Vaasan yliopisto

University of Vaasa - Vaasan yliopisto

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

316<br />

• Values and norms (Rothman & Friedman 2001; Schein 1995): these studies<br />

examined the manner in which changes in organisational values and norms may<br />

influence the direction and type <strong>of</strong> corporate learning processes, and the<br />

outcomes from these processes. CR-/sustainability-oriented values and norms<br />

manifest themselves in mission statements and well-developed (sustainability)<br />

reporting schemes (Alvesson 2005), particularly in large companies. According<br />

to Arnold (2007) the fear <strong>of</strong> damage to the companies’ reputation is a strong<br />

driver for stakeholder orientation in the companies. When coupled with the<br />

tradition <strong>of</strong> these companies <strong>of</strong> accepting responsibility for common welfare, this<br />

fear led to distinctive learning and innovation efforts.<br />

• Knowledge transfer (Barabási 2002; Blatter 2003; Crampton et al. 1998; Mutch<br />

2002): the research examined the role <strong>of</strong> internal networks (formal and informal)<br />

in disseminating sustainability-related knowledge through the organisation.<br />

Knowledge transfer, e.g. via internal networks, is an important vehicle for CR<br />

learning, particularly in the large companies (Siebenhüner & Arnold 2007). Joint<br />

projects, conferences and virtual communities were all identified as important in<br />

allowing information to be exchanged and new sustainability-/CR-related<br />

knowledge to be created.<br />

• Stakeholder requirements (Dyllick 1989; Hedberg 1981): Stakeholders have an<br />

influence on the CR to supporting change process. A tight collaboration with the<br />

stakeholders can enable CR change (Arnold 2007), e.g. by maintaining a good<br />

image and retaining the ability to be competitive.<br />

• Competition (March 1991; Walgenbach 2000): the entrepreneurial activities <strong>of</strong><br />

the competitors initiate sustainability-oriented changes by provoking reflecting<br />

and searching processes in the company which are the source for the<br />

development <strong>of</strong> new solutions. However, the condition has to be fulfilled that<br />

companies recognise changes in their relevant field and implement (or are able to<br />

implement) them in specific activities. At the same time there is a tight<br />

connection with ideas and guiding principles <strong>of</strong> a sustainable development or CD<br />

necessary, like zero emission, life-cycle concepts or responsible behaviour.<br />

Open Innovation Methods (OIM)<br />

User and community-based innovation are current trends in innovation management.<br />

User integration means including future customers and users in the innovation<br />

process on a targeted basis – from the initial idea all the way to the innovation's<br />

introduction and diffusion in the marketplace (phases: invention, development,<br />

testing, implementation, diffusion). User integration in innovation processes and<br />

community-based innovation could enhance awareness <strong>of</strong> products and increase their<br />

acceptance among a broader public. So called lead users are a vital source <strong>of</strong><br />

innovation (von Hippel 2005, 1988,). Since the 1980s a number <strong>of</strong> empirical studies<br />

has been conducted regarding lead users in high technology and industrial markets<br />

(Franke & Shah 2003; Herstatt & von Hippel 1992; Lilien et al. 2002; Olson &<br />

Bakke 2001; Urban & von Hippel 1988).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!