29.01.2013 Views

University of Vaasa - Vaasan yliopisto

University of Vaasa - Vaasan yliopisto

University of Vaasa - Vaasan yliopisto

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Table 1 List <strong>of</strong> factors affecting for CSR Implementations<br />

Factors<br />

Motivations:<br />

Scholar (Year)<br />

�Long-term benefits<br />

�Short-term benefits<br />

Longo et al. (2005)<br />

Besser & Miller (2001); Friedman & Miles<br />

Jenkins (2004a)<br />

�Enhancement <strong>of</strong> competitive<br />

�Improvement <strong>of</strong> corporate image or<br />

�Cost reduction and efficiency<br />

�Recruitment <strong>of</strong> valuable employees<br />

reduction <strong>of</strong> staff turnover<br />

Article 13 (2003); Toyne (2003)<br />

Perrini (2006) ; DTI (2003)<br />

Niblock-Siddle et al. (2007)<br />

Niblock-Siddle et al. (2007)<br />

�Consistency with social needs<br />

�Compliance with government<br />

avoid breaking the law<br />

Enderle (2004)<br />

Haigh & Jones (2006)<br />

�Compliance with customers’ needs Castka et al. (2003), Simpson, Taylor &<br />

Longo et al. (2005), Haigh & Jones(2006)<br />

�Pressures from shareholders<br />

�Pressure from supply chains<br />

�Pressure from communities<br />

�Pressure from NGOs<br />

�Moral factor or personal value<br />

Haigh & Jones (2006)<br />

Jenkins (2004a)<br />

Princic (2003);<br />

Haigh & Jones (2006)<br />

EC (2002); Longo et al. (2005); Princic<br />

Jenkins (2004b); DTI (2003); Toyne<br />

Hemingway & Maclagan (2004)<br />

�corporate cultures<br />

Barriers:<br />

Lynes & Andrachuk (2008)<br />

�restrictions in costs<br />

�restrictions in time and resources<br />

�lack <strong>of</strong> tools<br />

�lack <strong>of</strong> acknowledgement <strong>of</strong><br />

Niblock-Siddle et al. (2007)<br />

Niblock-Siddle et al. (2007)<br />

Niblock-Siddle et al. (2007)<br />

Niblock-Siddle et al. (2007)<br />

806<br />

Rogers (1962) proposed the model <strong>of</strong> “innovation—adoption” to divide the adoption<br />

process into five stages, which are knowledge, interests, assessment, trials and<br />

adoption. Among the large number <strong>of</strong> models for the process <strong>of</strong> organizational<br />

innovativeness, the most widely adopted one is the diffusion <strong>of</strong> innovations proposed<br />

by Rogers (1983). Rogers defined the diffusion process as the process <strong>of</strong> the<br />

distribution <strong>of</strong> a new concept to final adopters or users from the sources <strong>of</strong><br />

innovation or creation. This process is divided into five stages, as shown in Figure 1.<br />

For the persuasion stage, Rogers (1983) proposed five “innovation perception<br />

characteristics”, and suggested that these characteristics have influence on the<br />

persuasion stage <strong>of</strong> potential adopters in innovations. Below is an explanation <strong>of</strong><br />

these five characteristics.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!