29.01.2013 Views

University of Vaasa - Vaasan yliopisto

University of Vaasa - Vaasan yliopisto

University of Vaasa - Vaasan yliopisto

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

705<br />

14001 and the GRI guideline 7 are completely voluntary self-regulation for<br />

information disclosure. Therefore my assumption in this paper is that CSR is a<br />

voluntary based action to build institutions which reduce the information costs <strong>of</strong><br />

stakeholders.<br />

In sum, this paper discusses about<br />

1. whether a company reduces the information costs on a voluntary basis (it<br />

must not start as a voluntary action),<br />

2. whether this transition made the relationship change (it does not mean<br />

friendly),<br />

3. and whether this change is permanent.<br />

Case study<br />

Debate about Social Responsibility in both Countries<br />

How did social responsibility in both countries look like before CSR started to<br />

develop? Japan and Germany’s social responsibility was oriented by compliance and<br />

corporate citizenship. Especially strong influence <strong>of</strong> compliance was a significant<br />

deference in Anglo-Saxon CSR and that <strong>of</strong> Japan and Germany. This was affected by<br />

the political institution <strong>of</strong> these countries. Jerfrey Broadent and Yoshito Ishio<br />

described Japan’s policy system as an ‘embedded broker’. The government exercises<br />

much weaker formal regulatory control over companies, but it engages and “guides”<br />

companies in more subtle ways. Through such networks and mutual trust the<br />

Japanese government has provided business with guidance that allowed coordinating<br />

collective efforts. Companies in trusted the government to absorb their concerns and<br />

give good collective guidance based on it. The Shingikai (Advisory Council) Method<br />

is a typical Japanese way <strong>of</strong> group decision making. To avoid open confrontation<br />

ministries organise their Shingikai to which they invite key interest groups and<br />

opinion leaders with the purpose <strong>of</strong> according to special provisions <strong>of</strong> relevant laws.<br />

However, there has been criticism <strong>of</strong> this ‘closed’ method, because, according to<br />

Suda and Nakamura, the selection and nominations <strong>of</strong> committee members are up to<br />

the discretion <strong>of</strong> government (Imura 2005). In Japan, thus, the state has actively<br />

engaged in the market. There has been considerable deregulation in Japan following<br />

the American example. Yet, government continues to play (or try to play) an<br />

important role in many economic areas negotiating with industry over how to address<br />

various policy concerns. This is true in the environmental realm as well (Schreurs<br />

2003).<br />

The European countries including Germany traditionally try to regulate companies<br />

through legislation. Typically it enacted direct regulations. Social Market Economies<br />

influences unemployment, health, and environmental policy choices in Germany.<br />

Germany has not embraced deregulation in the way the USA has. Instead, taxes<br />

remain high and government regulations to tame market forces to promote social<br />

equality and environmental protection are generally accepted even through the cost<br />

<strong>of</strong> doing this is straining the government’s budget and raising some concerns about<br />

7 The GRI guideline is a de facto standard on responsible reporting produced by the Global Reporting Initiative.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!