29.01.2013 Views

University of Vaasa - Vaasan yliopisto

University of Vaasa - Vaasan yliopisto

University of Vaasa - Vaasan yliopisto

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Figure 6 - Impacts <strong>of</strong> agricultural practices on biodiversity<br />

562<br />

Good Agricultural Practices (GAP) 88 can sometimes have positive impacts on<br />

biodiversity but most <strong>of</strong> the times agricultural practices decrease it. This relation is<br />

generally inverse.<br />

GMO use can be considered as an agricultural practice. The impacts <strong>of</strong> GMO on<br />

biodiversity can therefore be introduced here.<br />

Agricultural Practices – Greenhouse Gases Emissions<br />

Agricultural practices can also influence GHG emissions (see figure 7). For example,<br />

use <strong>of</strong> fertilisers will increase N2O emissions. However Good Agricultural Practices<br />

can decrease GHG emissions. Agricultural practices are crop- and region-specific<br />

according to climate, soil quality or level <strong>of</strong> mechanisation. Depending on these<br />

factors, agricultural practices effects on GHG emissions balance can be either<br />

positive or negative. Nevertheless, as agricultural activity (machinery work,<br />

fertilisers and pesticides application…) is expected to increase in the future, due<br />

(partly) to bioenergy demand, GHG emissions are also supposed to increase. There is<br />

a correlation between these externalities.<br />

37 GAP are described by cross-compliance rules (EC 2003) <strong>of</strong> Common Agricultural Policy (CAP).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!