2394 weitere kritische Veröffentlichungen - Kritische Stimmen zur ...

Engelhardt, Wolfgang 2011
[Brief an Dr. Albrecht Fölsing über Einsteins Herleitung
der Lorentz-Transformation]: München, 26.6.
2005 / Wolfgang Engelhardt. - [Deutschland]: WWW
2011. 6 S.
URL: http://www.wissenschaftliche-physik.com/
Anhaenge/Brief-an-Foelsing-neu1.pdf
Status: Kritik. - Quelle: Autopsie.
Engelhardt, Wolfgang 2011
[Brief an Dr. Albrecht Fölsing über Einsteins Motiv,
in seinem Aufsatz von 1905 keine Arbeiten anderer
Autoren zu zitieren]: München, 26.7.2005 / Wolfgang
Engelhardt. - [Deutschland]: WWW 2011. 2 S.
URL: http://www.wissenschaftliche-physik.com/
Anhaenge/Brief-an-Foelsing-neu2.pdf
Status: Kritik. - Quelle: Autopsie.
Engelhardt, Wolfgang 2011
Herleitung der konstanten Lichtgeschwindigkeit für alle
Beobachter unter Voraussetzung der Lorentztransformation
/ Wolfgang Engelhardt. - [Deutschland]: WWW
2011. 2 S.
URL: http://www.wissenschaftliche-physik.com/
Anhaenge/Lorentztransformation.pdf
Status: Kritik. - Quelle: Autopsie.
Erdmann, Adolph 2005
Faster than light, the revolutionary radio antenna that
conquers space: [datiert: 2.5.05] / Adolph & Erich
Erdmann.
In: The general science journal. 2005 =
http://www.wbabin.net/physics/erdmann.pdf - 10
S.
SRT. C-S. EXP.
Auszüge: "My brother and I believe that it is not
enough just to publish the results of one's experiments,
but to describe the actual tests themselves so that others
may be able to duplicate them. In this way the experimenter
does not have to take another person's word for
it, but has the opportunity to see the proof for him- or
herself. Most scientific experiments of significance are
very expensive, and the outcome is not always conclusive.
Our experiments on the other hand are very affordable,
some of them costing only a few dollars. The
outcomes of all the tests are unmistakable.
Although only the electrostatic field antenna is
registered with CIPO (#2441882) as a faster than light
radio antenna, the magnetic field antenna is capable of
the same feat. We were aware of that fact when we decided
to register the magnetic field antenna with CIPO.
However, we felt that the primary application of this
antenna should be underwater communication. As far
as we know underwater radio communication is only
possible by using a magnetic field as a carrier for the
communication signal (see below). The faster than light
signal transmission capability of this antenna is of
secondary importance, since we believe the electrostatic
antenna is more suited for this task. Nevertheless, both
antennas should be tested for the faster than light
capability, if for no other reason than to proof that both,
the electrostatic and the magnetic field act instantaneously
(or almost instantaneously)."
Erickson, Peter F. 2008
Absolute space, absolute time, & absolute motion /
Peter F. Erickson. - Philadelphia: Xlibris 2008. 268
Status: Kandidat. - Quelle: Turner 2007 (Rezension).
Essen, Louis 1976
A criticism of the special theory of relativity.
In: Wissen im Werden. 12. 1976, H. 2/3.
Status: Kandidat. - Quelle: Kammerer 1979 (Leitbild),
S. 1.
Essen, Louis 1981
A criticism of the special theory of relativity / L. Essen.
In: Kammerer, E.: Schwindel als Wissenschaft.
1981. (2 S.)
Abdruck aus: Wissen im Werden. 12. 1976, H. 2/3.
SRT. ZD. UHP. ERK. SOZIO.
Auszüge: "The general acceptance and continued teaching
of the special theory of relativity is, in my view, hindering
the progress of physical science by discouraging the search
for a more rational theory. There is no great difficulty in
exposing the faults in the theory but great difficulty in
persuading scientists even to consider the possibility that
it might be wrong. They have accepted the theory without
completely under-standing it and are reluctant to think
about further. A frequent comment, made even by eminent
scientists, is "I do not understand it myself but the
experts must be right".
This attitude is encouraged by three myths which
are widely disseminated. These are that the theory is
accepted by all reputable scientists, is too profound for
ordinary minds to comprehend, and has been confirmed
by many experiments. A careful study of the literature
shows that there have been numerous critics, that any
difficulty in understanding it arises from its ambiguities
and mistakes rather than its profundity, and that no
experiment, of the kind needed to check the relativity
aspect of the theory, has ever been attempted." [...]
"One of the predictions in Einstein's paper [Naturwissenschaften.
48. 1918, 697] is that the time "marked"
by a moving clock is slow by 1/2(v/c)² seconds per
second when "viewed in the stationary system"; but the
practical implications of the prediction were never
realised. There is only one way of "viewing" the time of
the distant clock, whether it is moving or not, and that
Textversion 1.2 - 2012 115
G. O. Mueller: SRT Kap. 4-Erg..